Interrupting the discourse: A response to reid and valle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reid and Valle (in this issue) illustrate how discourse within the field of learning disabilities (LD) determines what can and cannot be said and shapes what counts as knowledge or truth. Because basic assumptions about disability often remain unquestioned, Reid and Valle ask us to focus on the epistemological foundations of the field of LD. They demonstrate how discourse, far from being simply an academic or abstract theoretical pursuit, has direct material consequences for people labeled as having LD. In this response, I highlight some of the ways that the discourse in the LD field is getting in the way of truly transforming education for all learners and impeding our ability to ask the hard questions about our own complicity in issues such as the overrepresentation of students of color and the inaccessibility of general education learning environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)509-515
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Learning Disabilities
Volume37
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 2004

Fingerprint

Learning Disorders
learning disability
discourse
Complicity
Education
Aptitude
general education
learning environment
Color
disability
Learning
Students
ability
education
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Interrupting the discourse : A response to reid and valle. / Ferri, Beth A.

In: Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 37, No. 6, 11.2004, p. 509-515.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{de5310f6b60f48598615ccc2e694b46c,
title = "Interrupting the discourse: A response to reid and valle",
abstract = "Reid and Valle (in this issue) illustrate how discourse within the field of learning disabilities (LD) determines what can and cannot be said and shapes what counts as knowledge or truth. Because basic assumptions about disability often remain unquestioned, Reid and Valle ask us to focus on the epistemological foundations of the field of LD. They demonstrate how discourse, far from being simply an academic or abstract theoretical pursuit, has direct material consequences for people labeled as having LD. In this response, I highlight some of the ways that the discourse in the LD field is getting in the way of truly transforming education for all learners and impeding our ability to ask the hard questions about our own complicity in issues such as the overrepresentation of students of color and the inaccessibility of general education learning environments.",
author = "Ferri, {Beth A}",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "509--515",
journal = "Journal of Learning Disabilities",
issn = "0022-2194",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interrupting the discourse

T2 - A response to reid and valle

AU - Ferri, Beth A

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - Reid and Valle (in this issue) illustrate how discourse within the field of learning disabilities (LD) determines what can and cannot be said and shapes what counts as knowledge or truth. Because basic assumptions about disability often remain unquestioned, Reid and Valle ask us to focus on the epistemological foundations of the field of LD. They demonstrate how discourse, far from being simply an academic or abstract theoretical pursuit, has direct material consequences for people labeled as having LD. In this response, I highlight some of the ways that the discourse in the LD field is getting in the way of truly transforming education for all learners and impeding our ability to ask the hard questions about our own complicity in issues such as the overrepresentation of students of color and the inaccessibility of general education learning environments.

AB - Reid and Valle (in this issue) illustrate how discourse within the field of learning disabilities (LD) determines what can and cannot be said and shapes what counts as knowledge or truth. Because basic assumptions about disability often remain unquestioned, Reid and Valle ask us to focus on the epistemological foundations of the field of LD. They demonstrate how discourse, far from being simply an academic or abstract theoretical pursuit, has direct material consequences for people labeled as having LD. In this response, I highlight some of the ways that the discourse in the LD field is getting in the way of truly transforming education for all learners and impeding our ability to ask the hard questions about our own complicity in issues such as the overrepresentation of students of color and the inaccessibility of general education learning environments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10044249737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10044249737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15586469

AN - SCOPUS:10044249737

VL - 37

SP - 509

EP - 515

JO - Journal of Learning Disabilities

JF - Journal of Learning Disabilities

SN - 0022-2194

IS - 6

ER -