Institutions for the Mentally Retarded: A War Disguised as Debate

Burton Blatt, James F. Winschel, Gail L Ensher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Current controversies over the welfare of the mentally retarded are evident in bold relief in three discussions of the plight and future of institutions. One participant traces the problem to a prejudice with which we have historically greeted people who are different and which has now become a sickness affecting all of society. Another deplores a rampant welfarism that has denuded families of a sense of personal responsibility and has encouraged “institutionalization” as a convenient solution to the problems of our most needy citizens. The last author calls for a remolding of the institutional mission and a reduction of that negativism which is the special province of the academic community. In total, these debates attempt to provide a theoretical underpinning for decisions that will affect the well-being of the mentally retarded for decades to come.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-273
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Special Education
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1977

Fingerprint

Mentally Disabled Persons
Negativism
Institutionalization
institutionalization
prejudice
illness
well-being
welfare
citizen
responsibility
community
Warfare
Society

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Institutions for the Mentally Retarded : A War Disguised as Debate. / Blatt, Burton; Winschel, James F.; Ensher, Gail L.

In: Journal of Special Education, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1977, p. 267-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blatt, Burton ; Winschel, James F. ; Ensher, Gail L. / Institutions for the Mentally Retarded : A War Disguised as Debate. In: Journal of Special Education. 1977 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 267-273.
@article{02f02ac3857d4c2592dee02d94fbb647,
title = "Institutions for the Mentally Retarded: A War Disguised as Debate",
abstract = "Current controversies over the welfare of the mentally retarded are evident in bold relief in three discussions of the plight and future of institutions. One participant traces the problem to a prejudice with which we have historically greeted people who are different and which has now become a sickness affecting all of society. Another deplores a rampant welfarism that has denuded families of a sense of personal responsibility and has encouraged “institutionalization” as a convenient solution to the problems of our most needy citizens. The last author calls for a remolding of the institutional mission and a reduction of that negativism which is the special province of the academic community. In total, these debates attempt to provide a theoretical underpinning for decisions that will affect the well-being of the mentally retarded for decades to come.",
author = "Burton Blatt and Winschel, {James F.} and Ensher, {Gail L}",
year = "1977",
doi = "10.1177/002246697701100302",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "267--273",
journal = "Journal of Special Education",
issn = "0022-4669",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutions for the Mentally Retarded

T2 - A War Disguised as Debate

AU - Blatt, Burton

AU - Winschel, James F.

AU - Ensher, Gail L

PY - 1977

Y1 - 1977

N2 - Current controversies over the welfare of the mentally retarded are evident in bold relief in three discussions of the plight and future of institutions. One participant traces the problem to a prejudice with which we have historically greeted people who are different and which has now become a sickness affecting all of society. Another deplores a rampant welfarism that has denuded families of a sense of personal responsibility and has encouraged “institutionalization” as a convenient solution to the problems of our most needy citizens. The last author calls for a remolding of the institutional mission and a reduction of that negativism which is the special province of the academic community. In total, these debates attempt to provide a theoretical underpinning for decisions that will affect the well-being of the mentally retarded for decades to come.

AB - Current controversies over the welfare of the mentally retarded are evident in bold relief in three discussions of the plight and future of institutions. One participant traces the problem to a prejudice with which we have historically greeted people who are different and which has now become a sickness affecting all of society. Another deplores a rampant welfarism that has denuded families of a sense of personal responsibility and has encouraged “institutionalization” as a convenient solution to the problems of our most needy citizens. The last author calls for a remolding of the institutional mission and a reduction of that negativism which is the special province of the academic community. In total, these debates attempt to provide a theoretical underpinning for decisions that will affect the well-being of the mentally retarded for decades to come.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965779588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965779588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/002246697701100302

DO - 10.1177/002246697701100302

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84965779588

VL - 11

SP - 267

EP - 273

JO - Journal of Special Education

JF - Journal of Special Education

SN - 0022-4669

IS - 3

ER -