TY - JOUR
T1 - Insights into large audit firm sampling policies
AU - Christensen, Brant E.
AU - Elder, Randal J.
AU - Glover, Steven M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, American Accounting Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/12
Y1 - 2015/12
N2 - Changes in the audit profession after Sarbanes-Oxley, including mandatory audits of internal control over financial reporting and PCAOB oversight and inspection of audit work, have potentially changed the nature and extent of audit sampling in the largest accounting firms. In our study, “Behind the Numbers: Insights into Large Audit Firm Sampling Policies” (Christensen, Elder, and Glover 2015), we administered an extensive, open-ended survey to the national offices of the Big 4 and two other international accounting firms regarding their firm’s audit sampling policies. We find variation among the largest firms’ policies in their use of different sampling methods and in inputs used in the sampling applications that could result in different sample sizes. We also provide evidence of some of the sampling topics firms find most problematic, as well as changes to firms’ policies regarding revenue testing due to PCAOB inspections. Our evidence provides important insights into current sampling policies, which may be helpful to audit firms in evaluating their sampling inputs and overall sampling approaches.
AB - Changes in the audit profession after Sarbanes-Oxley, including mandatory audits of internal control over financial reporting and PCAOB oversight and inspection of audit work, have potentially changed the nature and extent of audit sampling in the largest accounting firms. In our study, “Behind the Numbers: Insights into Large Audit Firm Sampling Policies” (Christensen, Elder, and Glover 2015), we administered an extensive, open-ended survey to the national offices of the Big 4 and two other international accounting firms regarding their firm’s audit sampling policies. We find variation among the largest firms’ policies in their use of different sampling methods and in inputs used in the sampling applications that could result in different sample sizes. We also provide evidence of some of the sampling topics firms find most problematic, as well as changes to firms’ policies regarding revenue testing due to PCAOB inspections. Our evidence provides important insights into current sampling policies, which may be helpful to audit firms in evaluating their sampling inputs and overall sampling approaches.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958538790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958538790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2308/ciia-51223
DO - 10.2308/ciia-51223
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84958538790
SN - 1936-1270
VL - 9
SP - P7-P18
JO - Current Issues in Auditing
JF - Current Issues in Auditing
IS - 2
ER -