Information systems success in free and open source software development: Theory and measures

Kevin Crowston, James Howison, Hala Annabi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

199 Scopus citations

Abstract

Information systems success is one of the most widely used dependent variables in information systems (IS) research, but research on free/libre and open source software (FLOSS) often fails to appropriately conceptualize this important concept. In this article, we reconsider what success means within a FLOSS context. We first review existing models of IS success and success variables used in FLOSS research and assess them for their usefulness, practicality and fit to the FLOSS context. Then, drawing on a theoretical model of group effectiveness in the FLOSS development process, as well as an on-line discussion with developers, we present additional concepts that are central to an appropriate understanding of success for FLOSS. In order to examine the practicality and validity of this conceptual scheme, the second half of our article presents an empirical study that demonstrates operationalizations of the chosen measures and assesses their internal validity. We use data from SourceForge to measure the project's effectiveness in team building, the speed of the project at responding to bug reports and the project's popularity. We conclude by discussing the implications of this study for our proposed extension of IS success in the context of FLOSS development and highlight future directions for research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-148
Number of pages26
JournalSoftware Process Improvement and Practice
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006

Keywords

  • Concept development
  • Free/libre open source software
  • Information systems success
  • Survival analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Information systems success in free and open source software development: Theory and measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this