Abstract
If Amelia utters ‘Brad ate a salad in 2005’ assertorically, and she is speaking literally and sincerely, then I can infer that Amelia believes that Brad ate a salad in 2005. This paper discusses what makes this kind of inference truth-preserving. According to the baseline picture, my inference is truth-preserving because, if Amelia is a competent speaker, she believes that the sentence she uttered means that Brad ate a salad in 2005; thus, if Amelia believes that that sentence is true, then she must believe that Brad ate a salad in 2005. I argue that this view is not correct; on pain of irrationality, normal speakers can’t have specific beliefs about the meaning of the sentences they utter. I propose a new account, relying on the view that epistemically responsible speakers utter sentences assertorically only if they believe all the propositions which they think those sentences might mean.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 301-322 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Philosophical Quarterly |
Volume | 73 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 1 2023 |
Keywords
- assertion
- belief ascriptions
- knowledge of meaning
- linguistic competence
- semantic plasticity
- semantic underdetermination
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy