Inclusive reform as a response to high-stakes pressure? leading toward inclusion in the age of accountability

George Theoharis, Julie Causton, Chelsea P. Tracy-Bronson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Students identified with disabilities are increasingly being educated with the assistance of support services within heterogeneous (i.e., general education) classrooms. Yet, in this era of high-stakes accountability, students are labeled, sorted, and differentially treated according to their academic achievement as reflected on standardized tests. We engaged in a project to better understand how educators grapple with these externally imposed pressures as they work to change the organizational structure of their schools to be able to implement greater inclusion of their students served by special education. We spent four years in two elementary schools engaged in inclusive school reform (shifting from exclusionary model to an inclusive one) specifically as a response to the pressures of test-based accountability mandates. Our work was guided by the following questions. In this era of high-stakes testing accountability: What does school-wide inclusive reform for students with disabilities involve? What kinds of changes can result from inclusive reform? What role does leadership play in inclusive reform? The article focuses on what inclusive reform involved, the resulting changes, and the role distributed leadership played in moving toward more inclusive service in the age of high-stakes accountability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-30
Number of pages30
JournalTeachers College Record
Volume118
Issue number14
StatePublished - 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Inclusive reform as a response to high-stakes pressure? leading toward inclusion in the age of accountability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this