Inclusive reform as a response to high-stakes pressure? leading toward inclusion in the age of accountability

George Theoharis, Julie Causton, Chelsea P. Tracy-Bronson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Students identified with disabilities are increasingly being educated with the assistance of support services within heterogeneous (i.e., general education) classrooms. Yet, in this era of high-stakes accountability, students are labeled, sorted, and differentially treated according to their academic achievement as reflected on standardized tests. We engaged in a project to better understand how educators grapple with these externally imposed pressures as they work to change the organizational structure of their schools to be able to implement greater inclusion of their students served by special education. We spent four years in two elementary schools engaged in inclusive school reform (shifting from exclusionary model to an inclusive one) specifically as a response to the pressures of test-based accountability mandates. Our work was guided by the following questions. In this era of high-stakes testing accountability: What does school-wide inclusive reform for students with disabilities involve? What kinds of changes can result from inclusive reform? What role does leadership play in inclusive reform? The article focuses on what inclusive reform involved, the resulting changes, and the role distributed leadership played in moving toward more inclusive service in the age of high-stakes accountability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-30
Number of pages30
JournalTeachers College Record
Volume118
Issue number14
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

inclusion
reform
responsibility
student
disability
leadership
school reform
general education
organizational structure
special education
academic achievement
school
elementary school
assistance
educator
classroom

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Inclusive reform as a response to high-stakes pressure? leading toward inclusion in the age of accountability. / Theoharis, George; Causton, Julie; Tracy-Bronson, Chelsea P.

In: Teachers College Record, Vol. 118, No. 14, 2016, p. 1-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d313a0de04d740ab8d742682784f13b7,
title = "Inclusive reform as a response to high-stakes pressure? leading toward inclusion in the age of accountability",
abstract = "Students identified with disabilities are increasingly being educated with the assistance of support services within heterogeneous (i.e., general education) classrooms. Yet, in this era of high-stakes accountability, students are labeled, sorted, and differentially treated according to their academic achievement as reflected on standardized tests. We engaged in a project to better understand how educators grapple with these externally imposed pressures as they work to change the organizational structure of their schools to be able to implement greater inclusion of their students served by special education. We spent four years in two elementary schools engaged in inclusive school reform (shifting from exclusionary model to an inclusive one) specifically as a response to the pressures of test-based accountability mandates. Our work was guided by the following questions. In this era of high-stakes testing accountability: What does school-wide inclusive reform for students with disabilities involve? What kinds of changes can result from inclusive reform? What role does leadership play in inclusive reform? The article focuses on what inclusive reform involved, the resulting changes, and the role distributed leadership played in moving toward more inclusive service in the age of high-stakes accountability.",
author = "George Theoharis and Julie Causton and Tracy-Bronson, {Chelsea P.}",
year = "2016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "1--30",
journal = "Teachers College Record",
issn = "0161-4681",
publisher = "Teachers College Record",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inclusive reform as a response to high-stakes pressure? leading toward inclusion in the age of accountability

AU - Theoharis, George

AU - Causton, Julie

AU - Tracy-Bronson, Chelsea P.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Students identified with disabilities are increasingly being educated with the assistance of support services within heterogeneous (i.e., general education) classrooms. Yet, in this era of high-stakes accountability, students are labeled, sorted, and differentially treated according to their academic achievement as reflected on standardized tests. We engaged in a project to better understand how educators grapple with these externally imposed pressures as they work to change the organizational structure of their schools to be able to implement greater inclusion of their students served by special education. We spent four years in two elementary schools engaged in inclusive school reform (shifting from exclusionary model to an inclusive one) specifically as a response to the pressures of test-based accountability mandates. Our work was guided by the following questions. In this era of high-stakes testing accountability: What does school-wide inclusive reform for students with disabilities involve? What kinds of changes can result from inclusive reform? What role does leadership play in inclusive reform? The article focuses on what inclusive reform involved, the resulting changes, and the role distributed leadership played in moving toward more inclusive service in the age of high-stakes accountability.

AB - Students identified with disabilities are increasingly being educated with the assistance of support services within heterogeneous (i.e., general education) classrooms. Yet, in this era of high-stakes accountability, students are labeled, sorted, and differentially treated according to their academic achievement as reflected on standardized tests. We engaged in a project to better understand how educators grapple with these externally imposed pressures as they work to change the organizational structure of their schools to be able to implement greater inclusion of their students served by special education. We spent four years in two elementary schools engaged in inclusive school reform (shifting from exclusionary model to an inclusive one) specifically as a response to the pressures of test-based accountability mandates. Our work was guided by the following questions. In this era of high-stakes testing accountability: What does school-wide inclusive reform for students with disabilities involve? What kinds of changes can result from inclusive reform? What role does leadership play in inclusive reform? The article focuses on what inclusive reform involved, the resulting changes, and the role distributed leadership played in moving toward more inclusive service in the age of high-stakes accountability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009266138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009266138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 118

SP - 1

EP - 30

JO - Teachers College Record

JF - Teachers College Record

SN - 0161-4681

IS - 14

ER -