Inclusive η′ production from the γ(1S)

M. Artuso, C. Boulahouache, S. Blusk, K. Bukin, E. Dambasuren, R. Mountain, H. Muramatsu, R. Nandakumar, T. Skwarnicki, S. Stone, J. C. Wang, A. H. Mahmood, S. E. Csorna, I. Danko, G. Bonvicini, D. Cinabro, M. Dubrovin, S. McGee, A. Bornheim, E. LipelesS. P. Pappas, A. Shapiro, W. M. Sun, A. J. Weinstein, R. A. Briere, G. P. Chen, T. Ferguson, G. Tatishvili, H. Vogel, N. E. Adam, J. P. Alexander, K. Berkelman, V. Boisvert, D. G. Cassel, P. S. Drell, J. E. Duboscq, K. M. Ecklund, R. Ehrlich, R. S. Galik, L. Gibbons, B. Gittelman, S. W. Gray, D. L. Hartill, B. K. Heltsley, L. Hsu, C. D. Jones, J. Kandaswamy, D. L. Kreinick, A. Magerkurth, H. Mahlke-Krüger, T. O. Meyer, N. B. Mistry, J. R. Patterson, D. Peterson, J. Pivarski, S. J. Richichi, D. Riley, A. J. Sadoff, H. Schwarthoff, M. R. Shepherd, J. G. Thayer, D. Urner, T. Wilksen, A. Warburton, M. Weinberger, S. B. Athar, P. Avery, L. Breva-Newell, V. Potlia, H. Stoeck, J. Yelton, K. Benslama, B. I. Eisenstein, G. D. Gollin, I. Karliner, N. Lowrey, C. Plager, C. Sedlack, M. Selen, J. J. Thaler, J. Williams, K. W. Edwards, R. Ammar, D. Besson, X. Zhao, S. Anderson, V. V. Frolov, D. T. Gong, Y. Kubota, S. Z. Li, R. Poling, A. Smith, C. J. Stepaniak, J. Urheim, Z. Metreveli, K. K. Seth, A. Tomaradze, P. Zweber, S. Ahmed, M. S. Alam, J. Ernst, L. Jian, M. Saleem, F. Wappler, K. Arms, E. Eckhart, K. K. Gan, C. Gwon, K. Honscheid, D. Hufnagel, H. Kagan, R. Kass, T. K. Pedlar, E. von Toerne, M. M. Zoeller, H. Severini, P. Skubic, S. A. Dytman, J. A. Mueller, S. Nam, V. Savinov, S. Chen, J. W. Hinson, J. Lee, D. H. Miller, V. Pavlunin, E. I. Shibata, I. P.J. Shipsey, D. Cronin-Hennessy, A. L. Lyon, C. S. Park, W. Park, J. B. Thayer, E. H. Thorndike, T. E. Coan, Y. S. Gao, F. Liu, Y. Maravin, R. Stroynowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Using the CLEO II detector at CESR, we measure the η′ energy spectra in Y(1S) decays that we compare with models of the η′ g*g form factor. This form factor, especially at large η′ energies, may provide an explanation of the large rate for B→X s η′. Our data do not support a large anomalous coupling at higher q 2 and thus the large η′ rate remains a mystery, possibly requiring a non-standard-model explanation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number052003
JournalPhysical Review D
Volume67
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2003

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics
  • Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Artuso, M., Boulahouache, C., Blusk, S., Bukin, K., Dambasuren, E., Mountain, R., Muramatsu, H., Nandakumar, R., Skwarnicki, T., Stone, S., Wang, J. C., Mahmood, A. H., Csorna, S. E., Danko, I., Bonvicini, G., Cinabro, D., Dubrovin, M., McGee, S., Bornheim, A., ... Stroynowski, R. (2003). Inclusive η′ production from the γ(1S). Physical Review D, 67(5), [052003]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.052003