In the shadow of brown: Special education and overrepresentation of students of color

Beth A Ferri, David J. Connor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this first decade of the 21st century, we mark two milestones in education history: the 50th anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education decision in 2004, and the 30th anniversary of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 2005, Both Brown and IDEA asserted the need for increased educational opportunities for once excluded groups of students and asserted that segregation was inherently harmful and unequal. However, although we might wish to celebrate, there is also a need to critically examine the unfulfilled promise of both these efforts toward integrated education. In this article, we focus on one of the most long-standing critiques of special education practice: the disproportionate placement of students of color in special education programs, referred to in the education literature as overrepresentation. We then trace some of the origins of the current problem of overrepresentation by tracing the tangled relationship of special education and resegregation in the first years following the Brown decision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)93-100
Number of pages8
JournalRemedial and Special Education
Volume26
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2005

Fingerprint

Special Education
special education
Color
Students
Education
education
student
Anniversaries and Special Events
anniversary
disability
act
educational opportunity
segregation
History
history
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

In the shadow of brown : Special education and overrepresentation of students of color. / Ferri, Beth A; Connor, David J.

In: Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 26, No. 2, 03.2005, p. 93-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{92de31011ede4ca6ace1f3855099d720,
title = "In the shadow of brown: Special education and overrepresentation of students of color",
abstract = "In this first decade of the 21st century, we mark two milestones in education history: the 50th anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education decision in 2004, and the 30th anniversary of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 2005, Both Brown and IDEA asserted the need for increased educational opportunities for once excluded groups of students and asserted that segregation was inherently harmful and unequal. However, although we might wish to celebrate, there is also a need to critically examine the unfulfilled promise of both these efforts toward integrated education. In this article, we focus on one of the most long-standing critiques of special education practice: the disproportionate placement of students of color in special education programs, referred to in the education literature as overrepresentation. We then trace some of the origins of the current problem of overrepresentation by tracing the tangled relationship of special education and resegregation in the first years following the Brown decision.",
author = "Ferri, {Beth A} and Connor, {David J.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "93--100",
journal = "Remedial and Special Education",
issn = "0741-9325",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In the shadow of brown

T2 - Special education and overrepresentation of students of color

AU - Ferri, Beth A

AU - Connor, David J.

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - In this first decade of the 21st century, we mark two milestones in education history: the 50th anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education decision in 2004, and the 30th anniversary of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 2005, Both Brown and IDEA asserted the need for increased educational opportunities for once excluded groups of students and asserted that segregation was inherently harmful and unequal. However, although we might wish to celebrate, there is also a need to critically examine the unfulfilled promise of both these efforts toward integrated education. In this article, we focus on one of the most long-standing critiques of special education practice: the disproportionate placement of students of color in special education programs, referred to in the education literature as overrepresentation. We then trace some of the origins of the current problem of overrepresentation by tracing the tangled relationship of special education and resegregation in the first years following the Brown decision.

AB - In this first decade of the 21st century, we mark two milestones in education history: the 50th anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education decision in 2004, and the 30th anniversary of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 2005, Both Brown and IDEA asserted the need for increased educational opportunities for once excluded groups of students and asserted that segregation was inherently harmful and unequal. However, although we might wish to celebrate, there is also a need to critically examine the unfulfilled promise of both these efforts toward integrated education. In this article, we focus on one of the most long-standing critiques of special education practice: the disproportionate placement of students of color in special education programs, referred to in the education literature as overrepresentation. We then trace some of the origins of the current problem of overrepresentation by tracing the tangled relationship of special education and resegregation in the first years following the Brown decision.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17544377014&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17544377014&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:17544377014

VL - 26

SP - 93

EP - 100

JO - Remedial and Special Education

JF - Remedial and Special Education

SN - 0741-9325

IS - 2

ER -