In the name of morality

Moral responsibility, whiteness and social justice education

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper argues that the 'traditional conception of moral responsibility' authorizes and supports denials of white complicity. First, what is meant by the 'traditional conception of moral responsibility' is delineated and the enabling and disenabling characteristics of this view are highlighted. Then, three seemingly good, antiracist discourses that white students often engage in are discussed - the discourse of colour-blindness, the discourse of meritocracy and the discourse of individual choice - and analysed to show how they are all grounded in the 'traditional conception of moral responsibility'. The limitations of these discourses are drawn and how these discourses work to conceal white complicity is established. Finally, implications for social justice education are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-290
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Moral Education
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005

Fingerprint

morality
social justice
responsibility
discourse
education
meritocracy
blindness
Morality
Moral Responsibility
Social Justice
Education
Whiteness
Discourse
Conception
student
Complicity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

In the name of morality : Moral responsibility, whiteness and social justice education. / Applebaum, Barbara.

In: Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 34, No. 3, 09.2005, p. 277-290.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{80299c94da13451bb3ce8db7c69c363d,
title = "In the name of morality: Moral responsibility, whiteness and social justice education",
abstract = "This paper argues that the 'traditional conception of moral responsibility' authorizes and supports denials of white complicity. First, what is meant by the 'traditional conception of moral responsibility' is delineated and the enabling and disenabling characteristics of this view are highlighted. Then, three seemingly good, antiracist discourses that white students often engage in are discussed - the discourse of colour-blindness, the discourse of meritocracy and the discourse of individual choice - and analysed to show how they are all grounded in the 'traditional conception of moral responsibility'. The limitations of these discourses are drawn and how these discourses work to conceal white complicity is established. Finally, implications for social justice education are discussed.",
author = "Barbara Applebaum",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/03057240500206089",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "277--290",
journal = "Journal of Moral Education",
issn = "0305-7240",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In the name of morality

T2 - Moral responsibility, whiteness and social justice education

AU - Applebaum, Barbara

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - This paper argues that the 'traditional conception of moral responsibility' authorizes and supports denials of white complicity. First, what is meant by the 'traditional conception of moral responsibility' is delineated and the enabling and disenabling characteristics of this view are highlighted. Then, three seemingly good, antiracist discourses that white students often engage in are discussed - the discourse of colour-blindness, the discourse of meritocracy and the discourse of individual choice - and analysed to show how they are all grounded in the 'traditional conception of moral responsibility'. The limitations of these discourses are drawn and how these discourses work to conceal white complicity is established. Finally, implications for social justice education are discussed.

AB - This paper argues that the 'traditional conception of moral responsibility' authorizes and supports denials of white complicity. First, what is meant by the 'traditional conception of moral responsibility' is delineated and the enabling and disenabling characteristics of this view are highlighted. Then, three seemingly good, antiracist discourses that white students often engage in are discussed - the discourse of colour-blindness, the discourse of meritocracy and the discourse of individual choice - and analysed to show how they are all grounded in the 'traditional conception of moral responsibility'. The limitations of these discourses are drawn and how these discourses work to conceal white complicity is established. Finally, implications for social justice education are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25444480857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25444480857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03057240500206089

DO - 10.1080/03057240500206089

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 277

EP - 290

JO - Journal of Moral Education

JF - Journal of Moral Education

SN - 0305-7240

IS - 3

ER -