Improving Program Evaluation: Comparison of Intervention Strategies

Karen Eileen Kirkhart, Robert O. Morgan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A national study of two intervention strategies to improve evaluation was conducted in 131 community mental health centers (CMHCs) in nineteen states. Four randomly assigned comparison groups were compared by means of pre- and postintervention data from telephone interviews and mailed questionnaires. The intervention strategies-both based on theories of collaboration and ownership but differing with respect to the nature and timing of the activities-were shown to increase actual and planned use of an evaluation resource book. Possible future research on these intervention strategies is discussed in light of the changing role of program evaluation in CMHCs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-205
Number of pages7
JournalProfessional Psychology: Research and Practice
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1988

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this