Improved measured mile analysis technique

William Ibbs, Min Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Quantifying lost labor productivity on construction projects is difficult and sometimes subjective. A widely accepted way to quantify losses is the "measured mile" approach. It compares periods of a project that have been impacted by change to those that have not been impacted. As currently practiced the measured mile relies on subjectively identifying that reference period. In this paper the measured mile and a variant, the baseline method, are analyzed and compared to a new, proposed statistical clustering method. This new approach is advocated because it determines its reference period using objective criteria. A case study is included to show how the three methods work, and advantages and disadvantages of each method are presented in this paper.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1249-1256
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume131
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Claims
  • Construction management
  • Productivity
  • Project management
  • Statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Industrial relations
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improved measured mile analysis technique'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this