Implementation Science and Employer Disability Practices: Embedding Implementation Factors in Research Designs

The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose For work disability research to have an impact on employer policies and practices it is important for such research to acknowledge and incorporate relevant aspects of the workplace. The goal of this article is to summarize recent theoretical and methodological advances in the field of Implementation Science, relate these to research of employer disability management practices, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration culminating in an invited 3-day conference, “Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability”, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, MA, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with a special panel of knowledge experts with direct employer experience. Results A 4-phase implementation model including both outer and inner contexts was adopted as the most appropriate conceptual framework, and aligned well with the set of process evaluation factors described in both the work disability prevention literature and the grey literature. Innovative interventions involving disability risk screening and psychologically-based interventions have been slow to gain traction among employers and insurers. Research recommendations to address this are : (1) to assess organizational culture and readiness for change in addition to individual factors; (2) to conduct process evaluations alongside controlled trials; (3) to analyze decision-making factors among stakeholders; and (4) to solicit input from employers and insurers during early phases of study design. Conclusions Future research interventions involving workplace support and involvement to prevent disability may be more feasible for implementation if organizational decision-making factors are imbedded in research designs and interventions are developed to take account of these influences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)448-464
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Research Design
Research
Insurance Carriers
Workplace
Organizational Decision Making
Organizational Culture
Literature
Practice Management
Traction
Publications
Decision Making
Industry
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Disability prevention
  • Implementation factors
  • Research priorities
  • Workplace interventions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

Implementation Science and Employer Disability Practices : Embedding Implementation Factors in Research Designs. / The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention.

In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 448-464.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention. / Implementation Science and Employer Disability Practices : Embedding Implementation Factors in Research Designs. In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2016 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 448-464.
@article{dd167f090f2d4a8db42acaef167f8099,
title = "Implementation Science and Employer Disability Practices: Embedding Implementation Factors in Research Designs",
abstract = "Purpose For work disability research to have an impact on employer policies and practices it is important for such research to acknowledge and incorporate relevant aspects of the workplace. The goal of this article is to summarize recent theoretical and methodological advances in the field of Implementation Science, relate these to research of employer disability management practices, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration culminating in an invited 3-day conference, “Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability”, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, MA, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with a special panel of knowledge experts with direct employer experience. Results A 4-phase implementation model including both outer and inner contexts was adopted as the most appropriate conceptual framework, and aligned well with the set of process evaluation factors described in both the work disability prevention literature and the grey literature. Innovative interventions involving disability risk screening and psychologically-based interventions have been slow to gain traction among employers and insurers. Research recommendations to address this are : (1) to assess organizational culture and readiness for change in addition to individual factors; (2) to conduct process evaluations alongside controlled trials; (3) to analyze decision-making factors among stakeholders; and (4) to solicit input from employers and insurers during early phases of study design. Conclusions Future research interventions involving workplace support and involvement to prevent disability may be more feasible for implementation if organizational decision-making factors are imbedded in research designs and interventions are developed to take account of these influences.",
keywords = "Disability prevention, Implementation factors, Research priorities, Workplace interventions",
author = "{The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention} and Main, {Chris J.} and Nicholas, {Michael K.} and Shaw, {William S.} and Tetrick, {Lois E.} and Ehrhart, {Mark G.} and Glenn Pransky and Amick, {Benjamin C.} and Anema, {Johannes R.} and Elyssa Besen and Peter Blanck and Peter Blanck and Ute B{\"u}ltmann and Chan, {Chetwyn C H} and Delclos, {George L.} and Kerstin Ekberg and Ehrhart, {Mark G.} and Fassier, {Jean Baptiste} and Michael Feuerstein and David Gimeno and Kristman, {Vicki L.} and Linton, {Steven J.} and Main, {Chris J.} and Fehmidah Munir and Nicholas, {Michael K.} and Glenn Pransky and Shaw, {William S.} and Sullivan, {Michael J.} and Tetrick, {Lois E.} and Tveito, {Torill H.} and Eira Viikari-Juntura and Kelly Williams-Whitt and Young, {Amanda E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10926-016-9677-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "448--464",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-0487",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation Science and Employer Disability Practices

T2 - Embedding Implementation Factors in Research Designs

AU - The Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention

AU - Main, Chris J.

AU - Nicholas, Michael K.

AU - Shaw, William S.

AU - Tetrick, Lois E.

AU - Ehrhart, Mark G.

AU - Pransky, Glenn

AU - Amick, Benjamin C.

AU - Anema, Johannes R.

AU - Besen, Elyssa

AU - Blanck, Peter

AU - Blanck, Peter

AU - Bültmann, Ute

AU - Chan, Chetwyn C H

AU - Delclos, George L.

AU - Ekberg, Kerstin

AU - Ehrhart, Mark G.

AU - Fassier, Jean Baptiste

AU - Feuerstein, Michael

AU - Gimeno, David

AU - Kristman, Vicki L.

AU - Linton, Steven J.

AU - Main, Chris J.

AU - Munir, Fehmidah

AU - Nicholas, Michael K.

AU - Pransky, Glenn

AU - Shaw, William S.

AU - Sullivan, Michael J.

AU - Tetrick, Lois E.

AU - Tveito, Torill H.

AU - Viikari-Juntura, Eira

AU - Williams-Whitt, Kelly

AU - Young, Amanda E.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Purpose For work disability research to have an impact on employer policies and practices it is important for such research to acknowledge and incorporate relevant aspects of the workplace. The goal of this article is to summarize recent theoretical and methodological advances in the field of Implementation Science, relate these to research of employer disability management practices, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration culminating in an invited 3-day conference, “Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability”, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, MA, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with a special panel of knowledge experts with direct employer experience. Results A 4-phase implementation model including both outer and inner contexts was adopted as the most appropriate conceptual framework, and aligned well with the set of process evaluation factors described in both the work disability prevention literature and the grey literature. Innovative interventions involving disability risk screening and psychologically-based interventions have been slow to gain traction among employers and insurers. Research recommendations to address this are : (1) to assess organizational culture and readiness for change in addition to individual factors; (2) to conduct process evaluations alongside controlled trials; (3) to analyze decision-making factors among stakeholders; and (4) to solicit input from employers and insurers during early phases of study design. Conclusions Future research interventions involving workplace support and involvement to prevent disability may be more feasible for implementation if organizational decision-making factors are imbedded in research designs and interventions are developed to take account of these influences.

AB - Purpose For work disability research to have an impact on employer policies and practices it is important for such research to acknowledge and incorporate relevant aspects of the workplace. The goal of this article is to summarize recent theoretical and methodological advances in the field of Implementation Science, relate these to research of employer disability management practices, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration culminating in an invited 3-day conference, “Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability”, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, MA, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with a special panel of knowledge experts with direct employer experience. Results A 4-phase implementation model including both outer and inner contexts was adopted as the most appropriate conceptual framework, and aligned well with the set of process evaluation factors described in both the work disability prevention literature and the grey literature. Innovative interventions involving disability risk screening and psychologically-based interventions have been slow to gain traction among employers and insurers. Research recommendations to address this are : (1) to assess organizational culture and readiness for change in addition to individual factors; (2) to conduct process evaluations alongside controlled trials; (3) to analyze decision-making factors among stakeholders; and (4) to solicit input from employers and insurers during early phases of study design. Conclusions Future research interventions involving workplace support and involvement to prevent disability may be more feasible for implementation if organizational decision-making factors are imbedded in research designs and interventions are developed to take account of these influences.

KW - Disability prevention

KW - Implementation factors

KW - Research priorities

KW - Workplace interventions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992702540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992702540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10926-016-9677-7

DO - 10.1007/s10926-016-9677-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 27796914

AN - SCOPUS:84992702540

VL - 26

SP - 448

EP - 464

JO - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-0487

IS - 4

ER -