Idiographic and nomothetic approaches to heterogeneity are complementary: Response to comments on Evaluating the influences of temperature, primary production, and evolutionary history on bivalve growth rates

James Saulsbury, David K. Moss, Linda C. Ivany, Michał Kowalewski, David R. Lindberg, James F. Gillooly, Noel A. Heim, Craig R. McClain, Jonathan L. Payne, Peter D. Roopnarine, Bernd R. Schöne, David Goodwin, Seth Finnegan

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-277
Number of pages3
JournalPaleobiology
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Palaeontology

Cite this

Saulsbury, J., Moss, D. K., Ivany, L. C., Kowalewski, M., Lindberg, D. R., Gillooly, J. F., Heim, N. A., McClain, C. R., Payne, J. L., Roopnarine, P. D., Schöne, B. R., Goodwin, D., & Finnegan, S. (2020). Idiographic and nomothetic approaches to heterogeneity are complementary: Response to comments on Evaluating the influences of temperature, primary production, and evolutionary history on bivalve growth rates. Paleobiology, 46(2), 275-277. https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2020.20