Abstract
Increasing regulatory pressures have created specialization within boards, with more requirements and responsibilities being refocused to the committee level. Using data from S&P 1,500 firms, we find that board committee overlap associated with linking pin directors (i.e., those serving simultaneously on the audit and compensation committees) is an important conduit for knowledge transfer between boards' monitoring and incentive alignment functions. These directors are associated with lower executive compensation and influence pay mix. In studying the dynamics behind this process, we find that newly created linking pins improve monitoring effectiveness whereas recently dissolved linking pins decrease it. We also find that linking pins are all the more important when managers make less conservative accounting choices.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 964-981 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Strategic Management Journal |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 1 2016 |
Keywords
- agency conflicts
- board committees
- boards
- executive compensation
- monitoring
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Strategy and Management