How to integrate universal human rights into customary and religious legal systems?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Customary religious legal systems have been historically utilized in various areas, from fighting against crime to such mundane affairs as setting the price of goods and services in the market place or regulating personal and familial relations. Against this background, the present study focuses its lenses exclusively on so-called personal status systems as quintessential examples of customary religious legal systems in the contemporary world. In this context the article first addresses the question of why modern nation-states such as Israel, Egypt, and India still continue to employ pluralistic personal status systems and differentiate among their citizens despite the fact that they were originally founded on premises of non-discrimination and equal treatment. Secondly, the study explains how pluralistic organizations of law and justice affect the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals living under such systems; how they cope with limitations imposed upon their rights by communal/religious institutions; and what tactics and strategies they use to navigate through the maze of personal law. Lastly, after demonstrating what approaches have been successfully used to bring about changes in the context of Israeli, Egyptian, and Indian personal status laws, the paper identifies key lessons and recommendations for the purpose of helping human rights activists, donors and members of programmatic communities who design intervention mechanisms and tools to incorporate universal human rights standards into customary and religious systems around the world.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-40
Number of pages36
JournalJournal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law
Volume42
Issue number60
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

legal system
human rights
Law
equal treatment
fundamental right
Egypt
tactics
nation state
Israeli
Israel
justice
offense
India
citizen
market
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

How to integrate universal human rights into customary and religious legal systems? / Sezgin, Yuksel.

In: Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, Vol. 42, No. 60, 01.01.2010, p. 5-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2c1c010d37124bd1b1eb97774854b6a0,
title = "How to integrate universal human rights into customary and religious legal systems?",
abstract = "Customary religious legal systems have been historically utilized in various areas, from fighting against crime to such mundane affairs as setting the price of goods and services in the market place or regulating personal and familial relations. Against this background, the present study focuses its lenses exclusively on so-called personal status systems as quintessential examples of customary religious legal systems in the contemporary world. In this context the article first addresses the question of why modern nation-states such as Israel, Egypt, and India still continue to employ pluralistic personal status systems and differentiate among their citizens despite the fact that they were originally founded on premises of non-discrimination and equal treatment. Secondly, the study explains how pluralistic organizations of law and justice affect the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals living under such systems; how they cope with limitations imposed upon their rights by communal/religious institutions; and what tactics and strategies they use to navigate through the maze of personal law. Lastly, after demonstrating what approaches have been successfully used to bring about changes in the context of Israeli, Egyptian, and Indian personal status laws, the paper identifies key lessons and recommendations for the purpose of helping human rights activists, donors and members of programmatic communities who design intervention mechanisms and tools to incorporate universal human rights standards into customary and religious systems around the world.",
author = "Yuksel Sezgin",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/07329113.2010.10756635",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "5--40",
journal = "Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law",
issn = "0732-9113",
publisher = "William S. Hein & Company",
number = "60",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to integrate universal human rights into customary and religious legal systems?

AU - Sezgin, Yuksel

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Customary religious legal systems have been historically utilized in various areas, from fighting against crime to such mundane affairs as setting the price of goods and services in the market place or regulating personal and familial relations. Against this background, the present study focuses its lenses exclusively on so-called personal status systems as quintessential examples of customary religious legal systems in the contemporary world. In this context the article first addresses the question of why modern nation-states such as Israel, Egypt, and India still continue to employ pluralistic personal status systems and differentiate among their citizens despite the fact that they were originally founded on premises of non-discrimination and equal treatment. Secondly, the study explains how pluralistic organizations of law and justice affect the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals living under such systems; how they cope with limitations imposed upon their rights by communal/religious institutions; and what tactics and strategies they use to navigate through the maze of personal law. Lastly, after demonstrating what approaches have been successfully used to bring about changes in the context of Israeli, Egyptian, and Indian personal status laws, the paper identifies key lessons and recommendations for the purpose of helping human rights activists, donors and members of programmatic communities who design intervention mechanisms and tools to incorporate universal human rights standards into customary and religious systems around the world.

AB - Customary religious legal systems have been historically utilized in various areas, from fighting against crime to such mundane affairs as setting the price of goods and services in the market place or regulating personal and familial relations. Against this background, the present study focuses its lenses exclusively on so-called personal status systems as quintessential examples of customary religious legal systems in the contemporary world. In this context the article first addresses the question of why modern nation-states such as Israel, Egypt, and India still continue to employ pluralistic personal status systems and differentiate among their citizens despite the fact that they were originally founded on premises of non-discrimination and equal treatment. Secondly, the study explains how pluralistic organizations of law and justice affect the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals living under such systems; how they cope with limitations imposed upon their rights by communal/religious institutions; and what tactics and strategies they use to navigate through the maze of personal law. Lastly, after demonstrating what approaches have been successfully used to bring about changes in the context of Israeli, Egyptian, and Indian personal status laws, the paper identifies key lessons and recommendations for the purpose of helping human rights activists, donors and members of programmatic communities who design intervention mechanisms and tools to incorporate universal human rights standards into customary and religious systems around the world.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010050458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010050458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07329113.2010.10756635

DO - 10.1080/07329113.2010.10756635

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85010050458

VL - 42

SP - 5

EP - 40

JO - Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law

JF - Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law

SN - 0732-9113

IS - 60

ER -