At the heart of all separatist movements is the idea that the community in question would be better off handling its own aff airs, including its economic aff airs. Th e existence of economic globalization introduces a paradox: secession cannot produce full autonomy in economic matters because states with smaller economies tend to have less policy autonomy. This chapter argues that separatist movements will use very different strategies depending on the level of external (supra-national) and internal (sub-national) economic integration. Separatist groups in developed states (which tend to be integrated both at the domestic and international level) are more likely to look to political means and to support supra-national economic institutions to reduce their dependence on the central government, while such groups in developing countries (which tend to have lower levels of both types of integration) are more likely to use traditional, often violent, means of achieving independence. We test these arguments by examining the strategies of long standing separatist movements in Scotland, Quebec, Biafra and Tamil Eelam.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Title of host publication||The Nation in the Global Era|
|Subtitle of host publication||Conflict and Transformation|
|Number of pages||26|
|State||Published - May 1 2009|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences(all)