TY - JOUR
T1 - Front-line work and interpretive labor in an Angolan development program
AU - Peters, Rebecca Warne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham.
PY - 2019/10/2
Y1 - 2019/10/2
N2 - This paper ethnographically examines the in-country workforce of a decentralization program in postwar Angola. I compare the everyday activities of rank-and-file field staff to the policy prescriptions of the Good Governance in Angola Program (GGAP), carried out from 2007 to 2012. Focusing in particular on the work of the program’s Community Development Coordinators, the analysis reveals how field agents and administrative staff held highly discrepant ideas about implementation work that resulted in inadequate support and resources for community-level activities. Such divergent understandings of implementation work stem from pervasive power inequalities within the development industry that both produce and are supported by an inequitable division of interpretive labor; the relational work of understanding another’s perspective and responding accordingly. Development’s front-line agents are tasked with a double burden of interpretive labor and this aspect of their work, though crucial, goes unrecognized in the industry, simultaneously creating the conditions within which they can creatively respond to local contingencies and inadvertently concealing the true nature of their work and the extent of their resource needs from supervisors.
AB - This paper ethnographically examines the in-country workforce of a decentralization program in postwar Angola. I compare the everyday activities of rank-and-file field staff to the policy prescriptions of the Good Governance in Angola Program (GGAP), carried out from 2007 to 2012. Focusing in particular on the work of the program’s Community Development Coordinators, the analysis reveals how field agents and administrative staff held highly discrepant ideas about implementation work that resulted in inadequate support and resources for community-level activities. Such divergent understandings of implementation work stem from pervasive power inequalities within the development industry that both produce and are supported by an inequitable division of interpretive labor; the relational work of understanding another’s perspective and responding accordingly. Development’s front-line agents are tasked with a double burden of interpretive labor and this aspect of their work, though crucial, goes unrecognized in the industry, simultaneously creating the conditions within which they can creatively respond to local contingencies and inadvertently concealing the true nature of their work and the extent of their resource needs from supervisors.
KW - Africa
KW - Angola
KW - Policy implementation
KW - international development
KW - nongovernmental organizations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067847202&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067847202&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19460171.2019.1630658
DO - 10.1080/19460171.2019.1630658
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85067847202
SN - 1946-0171
VL - 13
SP - 414
EP - 431
JO - Critical Policy Studies
JF - Critical Policy Studies
IS - 4
ER -