From police state to police state? Legacies and law enforcement in Russia

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past twenty-five years, the Russian state has apparently come full circle. The Soviet Union was “the world’s largest-ever police state” (Kotkin 2001, 173). Reflecting on Vladimir Putin’s first two terms as president, C. J. Chivers (2008; see also Easter 2008) declared that Putin’s “signature legacy” was the rebuilding “of a more sophisticated and rational police state than the failed USSR.” If Russia has traveled the long road from police state to police state, what happened to the police during that journey? And does the historical legacy of the Soviet past explain the outcome? Legacies abound in the study of postcommunist law enforcement. Louise Shelley contends that communist, Soviet, and (in some cases) colonial legacies of Russian rule “will continue to weigh heavily on law enforcement in these nations for years to come” (1999, 85). Rasma Karklins observes that “a concrete legacy of the Soviet system” is the ability of officials to “use their investigative and judicial powers to intimidate citizens and political rivals” (2002, 30). Similarly, according to Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan (2010), the “enduring legacy of the KGB” lives on in the FSB, the Federal Security Service.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHistorical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages128-151
Number of pages24
ISBN (Print)9781107286191, 9781107054172
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

law enforcement
police
Russia
USSR
soviet system
judicial power
president
road
citizen
ability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Taylor, B. D. (2014). From police state to police state? Legacies and law enforcement in Russia. In Historical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe (pp. 128-151). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107286191.007

From police state to police state? Legacies and law enforcement in Russia. / Taylor, Brian D.

Historical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. Cambridge University Press, 2014. p. 128-151.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Taylor, BD 2014, From police state to police state? Legacies and law enforcement in Russia. in Historical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. Cambridge University Press, pp. 128-151. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107286191.007
Taylor BD. From police state to police state? Legacies and law enforcement in Russia. In Historical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. Cambridge University Press. 2014. p. 128-151 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107286191.007
Taylor, Brian D. / From police state to police state? Legacies and law enforcement in Russia. Historical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. Cambridge University Press, 2014. pp. 128-151
@inbook{707fa4af81fb47859a6154eb19df548a,
title = "From police state to police state? Legacies and law enforcement in Russia",
abstract = "Over the past twenty-five years, the Russian state has apparently come full circle. The Soviet Union was “the world’s largest-ever police state” (Kotkin 2001, 173). Reflecting on Vladimir Putin’s first two terms as president, C. J. Chivers (2008; see also Easter 2008) declared that Putin’s “signature legacy” was the rebuilding “of a more sophisticated and rational police state than the failed USSR.” If Russia has traveled the long road from police state to police state, what happened to the police during that journey? And does the historical legacy of the Soviet past explain the outcome? Legacies abound in the study of postcommunist law enforcement. Louise Shelley contends that communist, Soviet, and (in some cases) colonial legacies of Russian rule “will continue to weigh heavily on law enforcement in these nations for years to come” (1999, 85). Rasma Karklins observes that “a concrete legacy of the Soviet system” is the ability of officials to “use their investigative and judicial powers to intimidate citizens and political rivals” (2002, 30). Similarly, according to Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan (2010), the “enduring legacy of the KGB” lives on in the FSB, the Federal Security Service.",
author = "Taylor, {Brian D}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781107286191.007",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781107286191",
pages = "128--151",
booktitle = "Historical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - From police state to police state? Legacies and law enforcement in Russia

AU - Taylor, Brian D

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Over the past twenty-five years, the Russian state has apparently come full circle. The Soviet Union was “the world’s largest-ever police state” (Kotkin 2001, 173). Reflecting on Vladimir Putin’s first two terms as president, C. J. Chivers (2008; see also Easter 2008) declared that Putin’s “signature legacy” was the rebuilding “of a more sophisticated and rational police state than the failed USSR.” If Russia has traveled the long road from police state to police state, what happened to the police during that journey? And does the historical legacy of the Soviet past explain the outcome? Legacies abound in the study of postcommunist law enforcement. Louise Shelley contends that communist, Soviet, and (in some cases) colonial legacies of Russian rule “will continue to weigh heavily on law enforcement in these nations for years to come” (1999, 85). Rasma Karklins observes that “a concrete legacy of the Soviet system” is the ability of officials to “use their investigative and judicial powers to intimidate citizens and political rivals” (2002, 30). Similarly, according to Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan (2010), the “enduring legacy of the KGB” lives on in the FSB, the Federal Security Service.

AB - Over the past twenty-five years, the Russian state has apparently come full circle. The Soviet Union was “the world’s largest-ever police state” (Kotkin 2001, 173). Reflecting on Vladimir Putin’s first two terms as president, C. J. Chivers (2008; see also Easter 2008) declared that Putin’s “signature legacy” was the rebuilding “of a more sophisticated and rational police state than the failed USSR.” If Russia has traveled the long road from police state to police state, what happened to the police during that journey? And does the historical legacy of the Soviet past explain the outcome? Legacies abound in the study of postcommunist law enforcement. Louise Shelley contends that communist, Soviet, and (in some cases) colonial legacies of Russian rule “will continue to weigh heavily on law enforcement in these nations for years to come” (1999, 85). Rasma Karklins observes that “a concrete legacy of the Soviet system” is the ability of officials to “use their investigative and judicial powers to intimidate citizens and political rivals” (2002, 30). Similarly, according to Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan (2010), the “enduring legacy of the KGB” lives on in the FSB, the Federal Security Service.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923493657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923493657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781107286191.007

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781107286191.007

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84923493657

SN - 9781107286191

SN - 9781107054172

SP - 128

EP - 151

BT - Historical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -