TY - JOUR
T1 - Framing disability among young adults with disabilities and non-disabled young adults
T2 - An exploratory study
AU - Soffer, Michal
AU - Chew, Fiona
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Informa UK Ltd.
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - To explore how young adults frame disability and to compare the meanings of disability between persons with and without disabilities. Method: Snow ball sampling was used to recruit the participants. The sample comprised of 14 young adults from Upstate New York area; nine were non-disabled, five had a physical disability. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Five themes emerged from the analysis: disability as a deviation from "the norm", disability as inability, disability as something one needs to overcome, the role of the environment in disability, and disability as a negative phenomenon. The findings suggest that persons with disabilities hold somewhat different meanings of disability compared with non-disabled persons. Conclusions: While the biomedical frame of disability was somewhat challenged, disability is mainly understood via a biomedical lens. Disability should be framed as form of human diversity, not as a mark of Cain.Implications for RehabilitationThe ways through which disability is framed-as a medical issue or a social one-influences social attitudes and behaviors toward persons with disabilities as well as the shaping of disability policies and services. These, in turn, effect the well-being and impact the lives of persons with disabilities.In a relatively small sample which comprised of young adults with disabilities and non-disabled young adults, this study shows that while medical definitions of disability are somewhat contested, the medical definition of disability seems to prevail.
AB - To explore how young adults frame disability and to compare the meanings of disability between persons with and without disabilities. Method: Snow ball sampling was used to recruit the participants. The sample comprised of 14 young adults from Upstate New York area; nine were non-disabled, five had a physical disability. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Five themes emerged from the analysis: disability as a deviation from "the norm", disability as inability, disability as something one needs to overcome, the role of the environment in disability, and disability as a negative phenomenon. The findings suggest that persons with disabilities hold somewhat different meanings of disability compared with non-disabled persons. Conclusions: While the biomedical frame of disability was somewhat challenged, disability is mainly understood via a biomedical lens. Disability should be framed as form of human diversity, not as a mark of Cain.Implications for RehabilitationThe ways through which disability is framed-as a medical issue or a social one-influences social attitudes and behaviors toward persons with disabilities as well as the shaping of disability policies and services. These, in turn, effect the well-being and impact the lives of persons with disabilities.In a relatively small sample which comprised of young adults with disabilities and non-disabled young adults, this study shows that while medical definitions of disability are somewhat contested, the medical definition of disability seems to prevail.
KW - Biomedical model of disability
KW - Social model of disability
KW - Young adults
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920990446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920990446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/09638288.2014.913701
DO - 10.3109/09638288.2014.913701
M3 - Article
C2 - 24766151
AN - SCOPUS:84920990446
SN - 0963-8288
VL - 37
SP - 171
EP - 178
JO - Disability and Rehabilitation
JF - Disability and Rehabilitation
IS - 2
ER -