Five steps towards transformative valuation of nature

Mette Termansen, Sander Jacobs, Ram Pandit, Tuyeni H. Mwampamba, Nicolas Dendoncker, Marije Schaafsma, Victoria Contreras, Davide González-Jiménez, Haripriya Gundimeda, Heera Lee, Anna Filyushkina, Mariaelena Huambachano, Ignacio Palomo, Antonio J. Castro

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Values Assessment (VA) of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shows that while a wide range of valuation methods exist to include nature's values in diverse decision-making contexts, uptake of these methods remains limited. Building on the VA, this paper reviews five critical steps in the evaluation of project or policy proposals that can improve the inclusion of nature's values in decisions. Furthermore, improving valuation practice requires guidelines that utilise quality criteria for valuation of nature and ensure a balance between them. This paper proposes three such quality criteria: relevance, robustness and resource efficiency. The paper argues that the five steps and three Rs can generate a practical checklist to support commissioning, evaluation and performance of more plural valuations. Such guidelines can provide the next steps needed to improve uptake of nature valuation in decision-making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101344
JournalCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Volume64
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Five steps towards transformative valuation of nature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this