TY - JOUR
T1 - Five steps towards transformative valuation of nature
AU - Termansen, Mette
AU - Jacobs, Sander
AU - Pandit, Ram
AU - Mwampamba, Tuyeni H.
AU - Dendoncker, Nicolas
AU - Schaafsma, Marije
AU - Contreras, Victoria
AU - González-Jiménez, Davide
AU - Gundimeda, Haripriya
AU - Lee, Heera
AU - Filyushkina, Anna
AU - Huambachano, Mariaelena
AU - Palomo, Ignacio
AU - Castro, Antonio J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - The Values Assessment (VA) of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shows that while a wide range of valuation methods exist to include nature's values in diverse decision-making contexts, uptake of these methods remains limited. Building on the VA, this paper reviews five critical steps in the evaluation of project or policy proposals that can improve the inclusion of nature's values in decisions. Furthermore, improving valuation practice requires guidelines that utilise quality criteria for valuation of nature and ensure a balance between them. This paper proposes three such quality criteria: relevance, robustness and resource efficiency. The paper argues that the five steps and three Rs can generate a practical checklist to support commissioning, evaluation and performance of more plural valuations. Such guidelines can provide the next steps needed to improve uptake of nature valuation in decision-making.
AB - The Values Assessment (VA) of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shows that while a wide range of valuation methods exist to include nature's values in diverse decision-making contexts, uptake of these methods remains limited. Building on the VA, this paper reviews five critical steps in the evaluation of project or policy proposals that can improve the inclusion of nature's values in decisions. Furthermore, improving valuation practice requires guidelines that utilise quality criteria for valuation of nature and ensure a balance between them. This paper proposes three such quality criteria: relevance, robustness and resource efficiency. The paper argues that the five steps and three Rs can generate a practical checklist to support commissioning, evaluation and performance of more plural valuations. Such guidelines can provide the next steps needed to improve uptake of nature valuation in decision-making.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171786510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85171786510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101344
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101344
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85171786510
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 64
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
M1 - 101344
ER -