Finding the Loch Ness Monster: Left-Wing Authoritarianism in the United States

Lucian Gideon Conway, Shannon C. Houck, Laura Janelle Gornick, Meredith A. Repke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although past research suggests authoritarianism may be a uniquely right-wing phenomenon, the present two studies tested the hypothesis that authoritarianism exists in both right-wing and left-wing contexts in essentially equal degrees. Across two studies, university (n = 475) and Mechanical Turk (n = 298) participants completed either the RWA (right-wing authoritarianism) scale or a newly developed (and parallel) LWA (left-wing authoritarianism) scale. Participants further completed measurements of ideology and three domain-specific scales: prejudice, dogmatism, and attitude strength. Findings from both studies lend support to an authoritarianism symmetry hypothesis: Significant positive correlations emerged between LWA and measurements of liberalism, prejudice, dogmatism, and attitude strength. These results largely paralleled those correlating RWA with identical conservative-focused measurements, and an overall effect-size measurement showed LWA was similarly related to those constructs (compared to RWA) in both Study 1 and Study 2. Taken together, these studies provide evidence that LWA may be a viable construct in ordinary U.S. samples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1049-1067
Number of pages19
JournalPolitical Psychology
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Keywords

  • ideology
  • left-wing authoritarianism
  • right-wing authoritarianism
  • rigidity of the right

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Finding the Loch Ness Monster: Left-Wing Authoritarianism in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this