Facilitating co-production in public services: management implications from a systematic literature review

Mariafrancesca Sicilia, Alessandro Sancino, Tina Nabatchi, Enrico Guarini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Drawing on the results of a systematic literature review of empirical studies, this paper sheds light on six broad factors that facilitate the initiation and implementation of co-production in public services. The factors are classified into two overarching categories: organizational factors, including organizational arrangements, professional roles, and managerial tools; and procedural factors, including participant recruitment, participant preparation, and process design. For each set of factors, the paper provides a series of management implications. It concludes with additional observations for practice. IMPACT: Unfortunately, ‘one-size-fits-all’ does not apply to co-production. Policy-makers and public managers need use their knowledge, skills, and judgment to design, activate, and implement co-production activities. The paper presents three organizational factors (organizational arrangements, professional roles, and managerial tools) and three procedural factors (participant recruitment, participant preparation, and process design) that facilitate the initiation and implementation of co-production. Moreover, for each set of factors, the paper provides an important series of management implications that offer guidance to those who are using, or who wish to use, co-production in their organizations. Thus, this paper provides evidence-driven advice that can assist public managers and policy makers looking for ways to improve co-production in public services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPublic Money and Management
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

coproduction
public service
management
manager
literature
Factors
Service management
Co-production
Public services
Literature review
evidence

Keywords

  • Co-production
  • public services
  • systematic literature review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Facilitating co-production in public services : management implications from a systematic literature review. / Sicilia, Mariafrancesca; Sancino, Alessandro; Nabatchi, Tina; Guarini, Enrico.

In: Public Money and Management, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e1231bc2b154f2fb6e869baff83d48e,
title = "Facilitating co-production in public services: management implications from a systematic literature review",
abstract = "Drawing on the results of a systematic literature review of empirical studies, this paper sheds light on six broad factors that facilitate the initiation and implementation of co-production in public services. The factors are classified into two overarching categories: organizational factors, including organizational arrangements, professional roles, and managerial tools; and procedural factors, including participant recruitment, participant preparation, and process design. For each set of factors, the paper provides a series of management implications. It concludes with additional observations for practice. IMPACT: Unfortunately, ‘one-size-fits-all’ does not apply to co-production. Policy-makers and public managers need use their knowledge, skills, and judgment to design, activate, and implement co-production activities. The paper presents three organizational factors (organizational arrangements, professional roles, and managerial tools) and three procedural factors (participant recruitment, participant preparation, and process design) that facilitate the initiation and implementation of co-production. Moreover, for each set of factors, the paper provides an important series of management implications that offer guidance to those who are using, or who wish to use, co-production in their organizations. Thus, this paper provides evidence-driven advice that can assist public managers and policy makers looking for ways to improve co-production in public services.",
keywords = "Co-production, public services, systematic literature review",
author = "Mariafrancesca Sicilia and Alessandro Sancino and Tina Nabatchi and Enrico Guarini",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09540962.2019.1592904",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Public Money and Management",
issn = "0954-0962",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facilitating co-production in public services

T2 - management implications from a systematic literature review

AU - Sicilia, Mariafrancesca

AU - Sancino, Alessandro

AU - Nabatchi, Tina

AU - Guarini, Enrico

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Drawing on the results of a systematic literature review of empirical studies, this paper sheds light on six broad factors that facilitate the initiation and implementation of co-production in public services. The factors are classified into two overarching categories: organizational factors, including organizational arrangements, professional roles, and managerial tools; and procedural factors, including participant recruitment, participant preparation, and process design. For each set of factors, the paper provides a series of management implications. It concludes with additional observations for practice. IMPACT: Unfortunately, ‘one-size-fits-all’ does not apply to co-production. Policy-makers and public managers need use their knowledge, skills, and judgment to design, activate, and implement co-production activities. The paper presents three organizational factors (organizational arrangements, professional roles, and managerial tools) and three procedural factors (participant recruitment, participant preparation, and process design) that facilitate the initiation and implementation of co-production. Moreover, for each set of factors, the paper provides an important series of management implications that offer guidance to those who are using, or who wish to use, co-production in their organizations. Thus, this paper provides evidence-driven advice that can assist public managers and policy makers looking for ways to improve co-production in public services.

AB - Drawing on the results of a systematic literature review of empirical studies, this paper sheds light on six broad factors that facilitate the initiation and implementation of co-production in public services. The factors are classified into two overarching categories: organizational factors, including organizational arrangements, professional roles, and managerial tools; and procedural factors, including participant recruitment, participant preparation, and process design. For each set of factors, the paper provides a series of management implications. It concludes with additional observations for practice. IMPACT: Unfortunately, ‘one-size-fits-all’ does not apply to co-production. Policy-makers and public managers need use their knowledge, skills, and judgment to design, activate, and implement co-production activities. The paper presents three organizational factors (organizational arrangements, professional roles, and managerial tools) and three procedural factors (participant recruitment, participant preparation, and process design) that facilitate the initiation and implementation of co-production. Moreover, for each set of factors, the paper provides an important series of management implications that offer guidance to those who are using, or who wish to use, co-production in their organizations. Thus, this paper provides evidence-driven advice that can assist public managers and policy makers looking for ways to improve co-production in public services.

KW - Co-production

KW - public services

KW - systematic literature review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064488866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064488866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09540962.2019.1592904

DO - 10.1080/09540962.2019.1592904

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064488866

JO - Public Money and Management

JF - Public Money and Management

SN - 0954-0962

ER -