Exploring Tracer Information and Model Framework Trade-Offs to Improve Estimation of Stream Transient Storage Processes

Christa Kelleher, Adam Ward, J. L.A. Knapp, P. J. Blaen, M. J. Kurz, J. D. Drummond, J. P. Zarnetske, D. M. Hannah, C. Mendoza-Lera, N. M. Schmadel, T. Datry, J. Lewandowski, A. M. Milner, S. Krause

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Novel observation techniques (e.g., smart tracers) for characterizing coupled hydrological and biogeochemical processes are improving understanding of stream network transport and transformation dynamics. In turn, these observations are thought to enable increasingly sophisticated representations within transient storage models (TSMs). However, TSM parameter estimation is prone to issues with insensitivity and equifinality, which grow as parameters are added to model formulations. Currently, it is unclear whether (or not) observations from different tracers may lead to greater process inference and reduced parameter uncertainty in the context of TSM. Herein, we aim to unravel the role of in-stream processes alongside metabolically active (MATS) and inactive storage zones (MITS) using variable TSM formulations. Models with one (1SZ) and two storage zones (2SZ) and with and without reactivity were applied to simulate conservative and smart tracer observations obtained experimentally for two reaches with differing morphologies. As we show, smart tracers are unsurprisingly superior to conservative tracers when it comes to partitioning MITS and MATS. However, when transient storage is lumped within a 1SZ formulation, little improvement in parameter uncertainty is gained by using a smart tracer, suggesting the addition of observations should scale with model complexity. Importantly, our work identifies several inconsistencies and open questions related to reconciling time scales of tracer observation with conceptual processes (parameters) estimated within TSM. Approaching TSM with multiple models and tracer observations may be key to gaining improved insight into transient storage simulation as well as advancing feedback loops between models and observations within hydrologic science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalWater Resources Research
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

tracer
storage (process)
partitioning
timescale
parameter
simulation

Keywords

  • hyporheic zone
  • model intercomparison
  • resazurin
  • smart tracer
  • stream
  • transient storage modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Exploring Tracer Information and Model Framework Trade-Offs to Improve Estimation of Stream Transient Storage Processes. / Kelleher, Christa; Ward, Adam; Knapp, J. L.A.; Blaen, P. J.; Kurz, M. J.; Drummond, J. D.; Zarnetske, J. P.; Hannah, D. M.; Mendoza-Lera, C.; Schmadel, N. M.; Datry, T.; Lewandowski, J.; Milner, A. M.; Krause, S.

In: Water Resources Research, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kelleher, C, Ward, A, Knapp, JLA, Blaen, PJ, Kurz, MJ, Drummond, JD, Zarnetske, JP, Hannah, DM, Mendoza-Lera, C, Schmadel, NM, Datry, T, Lewandowski, J, Milner, AM & Krause, S 2019, 'Exploring Tracer Information and Model Framework Trade-Offs to Improve Estimation of Stream Transient Storage Processes', Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023585
Kelleher, Christa ; Ward, Adam ; Knapp, J. L.A. ; Blaen, P. J. ; Kurz, M. J. ; Drummond, J. D. ; Zarnetske, J. P. ; Hannah, D. M. ; Mendoza-Lera, C. ; Schmadel, N. M. ; Datry, T. ; Lewandowski, J. ; Milner, A. M. ; Krause, S. / Exploring Tracer Information and Model Framework Trade-Offs to Improve Estimation of Stream Transient Storage Processes. In: Water Resources Research. 2019.
@article{dd453bb323ea4bfebf9ea2856ab4c6cb,
title = "Exploring Tracer Information and Model Framework Trade-Offs to Improve Estimation of Stream Transient Storage Processes",
abstract = "Novel observation techniques (e.g., smart tracers) for characterizing coupled hydrological and biogeochemical processes are improving understanding of stream network transport and transformation dynamics. In turn, these observations are thought to enable increasingly sophisticated representations within transient storage models (TSMs). However, TSM parameter estimation is prone to issues with insensitivity and equifinality, which grow as parameters are added to model formulations. Currently, it is unclear whether (or not) observations from different tracers may lead to greater process inference and reduced parameter uncertainty in the context of TSM. Herein, we aim to unravel the role of in-stream processes alongside metabolically active (MATS) and inactive storage zones (MITS) using variable TSM formulations. Models with one (1SZ) and two storage zones (2SZ) and with and without reactivity were applied to simulate conservative and smart tracer observations obtained experimentally for two reaches with differing morphologies. As we show, smart tracers are unsurprisingly superior to conservative tracers when it comes to partitioning MITS and MATS. However, when transient storage is lumped within a 1SZ formulation, little improvement in parameter uncertainty is gained by using a smart tracer, suggesting the addition of observations should scale with model complexity. Importantly, our work identifies several inconsistencies and open questions related to reconciling time scales of tracer observation with conceptual processes (parameters) estimated within TSM. Approaching TSM with multiple models and tracer observations may be key to gaining improved insight into transient storage simulation as well as advancing feedback loops between models and observations within hydrologic science.",
keywords = "hyporheic zone, model intercomparison, resazurin, smart tracer, stream, transient storage modeling",
author = "Christa Kelleher and Adam Ward and Knapp, {J. L.A.} and Blaen, {P. J.} and Kurz, {M. J.} and Drummond, {J. D.} and Zarnetske, {J. P.} and Hannah, {D. M.} and C. Mendoza-Lera and Schmadel, {N. M.} and T. Datry and J. Lewandowski and Milner, {A. M.} and S. Krause",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/2018WR023585",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Water Resources Research",
issn = "0043-1397",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring Tracer Information and Model Framework Trade-Offs to Improve Estimation of Stream Transient Storage Processes

AU - Kelleher, Christa

AU - Ward, Adam

AU - Knapp, J. L.A.

AU - Blaen, P. J.

AU - Kurz, M. J.

AU - Drummond, J. D.

AU - Zarnetske, J. P.

AU - Hannah, D. M.

AU - Mendoza-Lera, C.

AU - Schmadel, N. M.

AU - Datry, T.

AU - Lewandowski, J.

AU - Milner, A. M.

AU - Krause, S.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Novel observation techniques (e.g., smart tracers) for characterizing coupled hydrological and biogeochemical processes are improving understanding of stream network transport and transformation dynamics. In turn, these observations are thought to enable increasingly sophisticated representations within transient storage models (TSMs). However, TSM parameter estimation is prone to issues with insensitivity and equifinality, which grow as parameters are added to model formulations. Currently, it is unclear whether (or not) observations from different tracers may lead to greater process inference and reduced parameter uncertainty in the context of TSM. Herein, we aim to unravel the role of in-stream processes alongside metabolically active (MATS) and inactive storage zones (MITS) using variable TSM formulations. Models with one (1SZ) and two storage zones (2SZ) and with and without reactivity were applied to simulate conservative and smart tracer observations obtained experimentally for two reaches with differing morphologies. As we show, smart tracers are unsurprisingly superior to conservative tracers when it comes to partitioning MITS and MATS. However, when transient storage is lumped within a 1SZ formulation, little improvement in parameter uncertainty is gained by using a smart tracer, suggesting the addition of observations should scale with model complexity. Importantly, our work identifies several inconsistencies and open questions related to reconciling time scales of tracer observation with conceptual processes (parameters) estimated within TSM. Approaching TSM with multiple models and tracer observations may be key to gaining improved insight into transient storage simulation as well as advancing feedback loops between models and observations within hydrologic science.

AB - Novel observation techniques (e.g., smart tracers) for characterizing coupled hydrological and biogeochemical processes are improving understanding of stream network transport and transformation dynamics. In turn, these observations are thought to enable increasingly sophisticated representations within transient storage models (TSMs). However, TSM parameter estimation is prone to issues with insensitivity and equifinality, which grow as parameters are added to model formulations. Currently, it is unclear whether (or not) observations from different tracers may lead to greater process inference and reduced parameter uncertainty in the context of TSM. Herein, we aim to unravel the role of in-stream processes alongside metabolically active (MATS) and inactive storage zones (MITS) using variable TSM formulations. Models with one (1SZ) and two storage zones (2SZ) and with and without reactivity were applied to simulate conservative and smart tracer observations obtained experimentally for two reaches with differing morphologies. As we show, smart tracers are unsurprisingly superior to conservative tracers when it comes to partitioning MITS and MATS. However, when transient storage is lumped within a 1SZ formulation, little improvement in parameter uncertainty is gained by using a smart tracer, suggesting the addition of observations should scale with model complexity. Importantly, our work identifies several inconsistencies and open questions related to reconciling time scales of tracer observation with conceptual processes (parameters) estimated within TSM. Approaching TSM with multiple models and tracer observations may be key to gaining improved insight into transient storage simulation as well as advancing feedback loops between models and observations within hydrologic science.

KW - hyporheic zone

KW - model intercomparison

KW - resazurin

KW - smart tracer

KW - stream

KW - transient storage modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065213592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065213592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2018WR023585

DO - 10.1029/2018WR023585

M3 - Article

JO - Water Resources Research

JF - Water Resources Research

SN - 0043-1397

ER -