TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring ecological patterns with structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis
AU - Arhonditsis, G. B.
AU - Stow, C. A.
AU - Steinberg, L. J.
AU - Kenney, M. A.
AU - Lathrop, R. C.
AU - McBride, S. J.
AU - Reckhow, K. H.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by a grant from the Water Environment Research Foundation through the University of North Carolina Water Resources Research Institute. We thank Curtis L. DeCasperi (King County, Washington State, Department of Natural Resources and Parks), Michael T. Brett (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington), and Olli Malve (Finnish Environment Institute) for helpful comments to an earlier draft of the manuscript. We also wish to thank Daniel E. Schindler (School of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences, University of Washington) for supplying zooplankton data for Lake Washington.
PY - 2006/2/25
Y1 - 2006/2/25
N2 - Structural equation modeling is a multivariate statistical method that allows evaluation of a network of relationships between manifest and latent variables. In this statistical technique, preconceptualizations that reflect research questions or existing knowledge of system structure create the initial framework for model development, while both direct and indirect effects and measurement errors are considered. Given the interesting features of this method, it is quite surprising that the number of applications in ecology is limited, and even less common in aquatic ecosystems. This study presents two examples where structural equation modeling is used for exploring ecological structures; i.e., summer epilimnetic phytoplankton dynamics. Both eutrophic (Lake Mendota) and mesotrophic (Lake Washington) conditions were used to test an initial hypothesized model that considered the regulatory role of abiotic factors and biological interactions on lake phytoplankton dynamics and water clarity during the summer stratification period. Generally, the model gave plausible results, while a higher proportion of the observed variability was accounted for in the eutrophic environment. Most importantly, we show that structural equation modeling provided a convenient means for assessing the relative role of several ecological processes (e.g., vertical mixing, intrusions of the hypolimnetic nutrient stock, herbivory) known to determine the levels of water quality variables of management interest (e.g., water clarity, cyanobacteria). A Bayesian hierarchical methodology is also introduced to relax the classical identifiability restrictions and treat them as stochastic. Additional advantages of the Bayesian approach are the flexible incorporation of prior knowledge on parameters, the ability to get information on multimodality in marginal densities (undetectable by standard procedures), and the fact that the structural equation modeling process does not rely on asymptotic theory which is particularly important when the sample size is small (commonly experienced in environmental studies). Special emphasis is given on how this Bayesian methodological framework can be used for assessing eutrophic conditions and assisting water quality management. Structural equation modeling has several attractive features that can be particularly useful to researchers when exploring ecological patterns or disentangling complex environmental management issues.
AB - Structural equation modeling is a multivariate statistical method that allows evaluation of a network of relationships between manifest and latent variables. In this statistical technique, preconceptualizations that reflect research questions or existing knowledge of system structure create the initial framework for model development, while both direct and indirect effects and measurement errors are considered. Given the interesting features of this method, it is quite surprising that the number of applications in ecology is limited, and even less common in aquatic ecosystems. This study presents two examples where structural equation modeling is used for exploring ecological structures; i.e., summer epilimnetic phytoplankton dynamics. Both eutrophic (Lake Mendota) and mesotrophic (Lake Washington) conditions were used to test an initial hypothesized model that considered the regulatory role of abiotic factors and biological interactions on lake phytoplankton dynamics and water clarity during the summer stratification period. Generally, the model gave plausible results, while a higher proportion of the observed variability was accounted for in the eutrophic environment. Most importantly, we show that structural equation modeling provided a convenient means for assessing the relative role of several ecological processes (e.g., vertical mixing, intrusions of the hypolimnetic nutrient stock, herbivory) known to determine the levels of water quality variables of management interest (e.g., water clarity, cyanobacteria). A Bayesian hierarchical methodology is also introduced to relax the classical identifiability restrictions and treat them as stochastic. Additional advantages of the Bayesian approach are the flexible incorporation of prior knowledge on parameters, the ability to get information on multimodality in marginal densities (undetectable by standard procedures), and the fact that the structural equation modeling process does not rely on asymptotic theory which is particularly important when the sample size is small (commonly experienced in environmental studies). Special emphasis is given on how this Bayesian methodological framework can be used for assessing eutrophic conditions and assisting water quality management. Structural equation modeling has several attractive features that can be particularly useful to researchers when exploring ecological patterns or disentangling complex environmental management issues.
KW - Bayesian analysis
KW - Ecological patterns
KW - Phytoplankton dynamics
KW - Structural equation modeling
KW - Water quality management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31944431695&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31944431695&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.028
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.028
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:31944431695
SN - 0304-3800
VL - 192
SP - 385
EP - 409
JO - Ecological Modelling
JF - Ecological Modelling
IS - 3-4
ER -