Evidence of disability after Daubert

Peter David Blanck; Heidi M. Berven

doi:10.1037/1076-8971.5.1.16

Evidence of disability after Daubert

Peter David Blanck, Heidi M. Berven

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The authors provide an overview of the legal elements of the prima facie case of disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and examine the impact of expert evidence in ADA litigation. The authors then present a model for classifying and understanding admissibility determinations involving scientific knowledge and clinical observations in cases brought under ADA. The model may be used to help analyze admissibility outcomes regarding expert evidence presented in ADA litigation.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	16-40
Number of pages	25
Journal	Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
Volume	5
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.5.1.16
State	Published - Mar 1999
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Social Psychology
Sociology and Political Science
Law

Access to Document

10.1037/1076-8971.5.1.16

Cite this

@article{d20e9ed47dbb41a5b89e99e6a44ccfc6,

title = "Evidence of disability after Daubert",

abstract = "The authors provide an overview of the legal elements of the prima facie case of disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and examine the impact of expert evidence in ADA litigation. The authors then present a model for classifying and understanding admissibility determinations involving scientific knowledge and clinical observations in cases brought under ADA. The model may be used to help analyze admissibility outcomes regarding expert evidence presented in ADA litigation.",

author = "Blanck, {Peter David} and Berven, {Heidi M.}",

year = "1999",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1037/1076-8971.5.1.16",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "5",

pages = "16--40",

journal = "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law",

issn = "1076-8971",

publisher = "American Psychological Association",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence of disability after Daubert

AU - Blanck, Peter David

AU - Berven, Heidi M.

PY - 1999/3

Y1 - 1999/3

N2 - The authors provide an overview of the legal elements of the prima facie case of disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and examine the impact of expert evidence in ADA litigation. The authors then present a model for classifying and understanding admissibility determinations involving scientific knowledge and clinical observations in cases brought under ADA. The model may be used to help analyze admissibility outcomes regarding expert evidence presented in ADA litigation.

AB - The authors provide an overview of the legal elements of the prima facie case of disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and examine the impact of expert evidence in ADA litigation. The authors then present a model for classifying and understanding admissibility determinations involving scientific knowledge and clinical observations in cases brought under ADA. The model may be used to help analyze admissibility outcomes regarding expert evidence presented in ADA litigation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033265746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033265746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/1076-8971.5.1.16

DO - 10.1037/1076-8971.5.1.16

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033265746

SN - 1076-8971

VL - 5

SP - 16

EP - 40

JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

IS - 1

ER -

Evidence of disability after Daubert

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this