Evaluation in the community mental health centers program: A bold new reproach?

William Neigher, James Ciarlo, Christina Hoven, Karen Eileen Kirkhart, Gerald Landsberg, Enid Light, Fred Newman, Elmer L. Struening, Lindsley Williams, Charles Windle, J. Richard Woy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Federal Community Mental Health Centers Program (CMHC)-from 1963 to 1981-was heralded as a revolution in mental health care. Championed by many, and severely criticized by others, the actual impact of the program on the nation's mental health remains unclear, The authorization to evaluate the CMHC Program came originally from congressional legislation (PL 90-174), and later from the policies and regulations of NIMH under a series of Federal laws, notably PL 63-94. From 1976-1980, two dominant evaluation strategies were prevalent: funds expended by NIMH each year for studies of CMHC services or program-wide evaluations, and a much larger expenditure by CMHCs to conduct their own, independent evaluations following federal guidelines. As the Center's Program was turned over to the states in the form of block grants (PL 97-35), a group of professionals involved with setting and carrying out federal CMHC evaluation policy of both varieties met in public forum to debate the impact of these two evaluation approaches. While some participants cited gains in evaluation technology and impact upon local management of CMHCs, others found the lack of a coordinated and systematic approach to evaluating the CMHC Program to have been an opportunity missed. The impact of CMHC evaluation efforts are also discussed in terms of their major contribution to the field of evaluation research as a whole.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-311
Number of pages29
JournalEvaluation and Program Planning
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Community Mental Health Centers
mental health
evaluation
community
Program Evaluation
National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Mental Health
programme
Community mental health
Evaluation
Organized Financing
Financial Management
Health Expenditures
Legislation
technology assessment
evaluation research
federal law
authorization
Guidelines
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Evaluation in the community mental health centers program : A bold new reproach? / Neigher, William; Ciarlo, James; Hoven, Christina; Kirkhart, Karen Eileen; Landsberg, Gerald; Light, Enid; Newman, Fred; Struening, Elmer L.; Williams, Lindsley; Windle, Charles; Woy, J. Richard.

In: Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1982, p. 283-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Neigher, W, Ciarlo, J, Hoven, C, Kirkhart, KE, Landsberg, G, Light, E, Newman, F, Struening, EL, Williams, L, Windle, C & Woy, JR 1982, 'Evaluation in the community mental health centers program: A bold new reproach?', Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 283-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(82)90001-5
Neigher, William ; Ciarlo, James ; Hoven, Christina ; Kirkhart, Karen Eileen ; Landsberg, Gerald ; Light, Enid ; Newman, Fred ; Struening, Elmer L. ; Williams, Lindsley ; Windle, Charles ; Woy, J. Richard. / Evaluation in the community mental health centers program : A bold new reproach?. In: Evaluation and Program Planning. 1982 ; Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 283-311.
@article{6f8c685b2d42478c85e33aa0b987812d,
title = "Evaluation in the community mental health centers program: A bold new reproach?",
abstract = "The Federal Community Mental Health Centers Program (CMHC)-from 1963 to 1981-was heralded as a revolution in mental health care. Championed by many, and severely criticized by others, the actual impact of the program on the nation's mental health remains unclear, The authorization to evaluate the CMHC Program came originally from congressional legislation (PL 90-174), and later from the policies and regulations of NIMH under a series of Federal laws, notably PL 63-94. From 1976-1980, two dominant evaluation strategies were prevalent: funds expended by NIMH each year for studies of CMHC services or program-wide evaluations, and a much larger expenditure by CMHCs to conduct their own, independent evaluations following federal guidelines. As the Center's Program was turned over to the states in the form of block grants (PL 97-35), a group of professionals involved with setting and carrying out federal CMHC evaluation policy of both varieties met in public forum to debate the impact of these two evaluation approaches. While some participants cited gains in evaluation technology and impact upon local management of CMHCs, others found the lack of a coordinated and systematic approach to evaluating the CMHC Program to have been an opportunity missed. The impact of CMHC evaluation efforts are also discussed in terms of their major contribution to the field of evaluation research as a whole.",
author = "William Neigher and James Ciarlo and Christina Hoven and Kirkhart, {Karen Eileen} and Gerald Landsberg and Enid Light and Fred Newman and Struening, {Elmer L.} and Lindsley Williams and Charles Windle and Woy, {J. Richard}",
year = "1982",
doi = "10.1016/0149-7189(82)90001-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "283--311",
journal = "Evaluation and Program Planning",
issn = "0149-7189",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation in the community mental health centers program

T2 - A bold new reproach?

AU - Neigher, William

AU - Ciarlo, James

AU - Hoven, Christina

AU - Kirkhart, Karen Eileen

AU - Landsberg, Gerald

AU - Light, Enid

AU - Newman, Fred

AU - Struening, Elmer L.

AU - Williams, Lindsley

AU - Windle, Charles

AU - Woy, J. Richard

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - The Federal Community Mental Health Centers Program (CMHC)-from 1963 to 1981-was heralded as a revolution in mental health care. Championed by many, and severely criticized by others, the actual impact of the program on the nation's mental health remains unclear, The authorization to evaluate the CMHC Program came originally from congressional legislation (PL 90-174), and later from the policies and regulations of NIMH under a series of Federal laws, notably PL 63-94. From 1976-1980, two dominant evaluation strategies were prevalent: funds expended by NIMH each year for studies of CMHC services or program-wide evaluations, and a much larger expenditure by CMHCs to conduct their own, independent evaluations following federal guidelines. As the Center's Program was turned over to the states in the form of block grants (PL 97-35), a group of professionals involved with setting and carrying out federal CMHC evaluation policy of both varieties met in public forum to debate the impact of these two evaluation approaches. While some participants cited gains in evaluation technology and impact upon local management of CMHCs, others found the lack of a coordinated and systematic approach to evaluating the CMHC Program to have been an opportunity missed. The impact of CMHC evaluation efforts are also discussed in terms of their major contribution to the field of evaluation research as a whole.

AB - The Federal Community Mental Health Centers Program (CMHC)-from 1963 to 1981-was heralded as a revolution in mental health care. Championed by many, and severely criticized by others, the actual impact of the program on the nation's mental health remains unclear, The authorization to evaluate the CMHC Program came originally from congressional legislation (PL 90-174), and later from the policies and regulations of NIMH under a series of Federal laws, notably PL 63-94. From 1976-1980, two dominant evaluation strategies were prevalent: funds expended by NIMH each year for studies of CMHC services or program-wide evaluations, and a much larger expenditure by CMHCs to conduct their own, independent evaluations following federal guidelines. As the Center's Program was turned over to the states in the form of block grants (PL 97-35), a group of professionals involved with setting and carrying out federal CMHC evaluation policy of both varieties met in public forum to debate the impact of these two evaluation approaches. While some participants cited gains in evaluation technology and impact upon local management of CMHCs, others found the lack of a coordinated and systematic approach to evaluating the CMHC Program to have been an opportunity missed. The impact of CMHC evaluation efforts are also discussed in terms of their major contribution to the field of evaluation research as a whole.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020439632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020439632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0149-7189(82)90001-5

DO - 10.1016/0149-7189(82)90001-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 10259966

AN - SCOPUS:0020439632

VL - 5

SP - 283

EP - 311

JO - Evaluation and Program Planning

JF - Evaluation and Program Planning

SN - 0149-7189

IS - 4

ER -