Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes

A performance matrix

Kirk Emerson, Tina Nabatchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Experiments in collaborative governance over the last several decades have transformed the way the public's business is getting done. Despite growing interest, empirical research on the performance of cross-boundary collaboration continues to be limited by conceptual and methodological challenges. This article extends previous research to develop a performance matrix for assessing the productivity of collaborative governance regimes (CGRs). Three performance levels (actions, outcomes, and adaptation) are addressed at three units of analysis (participant organizations, the CGR itself, and target goals), creating a performance matrix of nine critical dimensions of CGR productivity. This performance matrix is illustrated with a case study of a CGR operating on the U.S.-Mexico border.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)717-747
Number of pages31
JournalPublic Performance and Management Review
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

productivity
governance
performance
empirical research
Mexico
Productivity
Governance
experiment

Keywords

  • Collaborative governance
  • Collaborative governance regimes
  • Evaluation
  • Evaluation
  • Performance
  • Productivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes : A performance matrix. / Emerson, Kirk; Nabatchi, Tina.

In: Public Performance and Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 4, 01.01.2015, p. 717-747.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3d9d06b316a54235918616988622a5ad,
title = "Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A performance matrix",
abstract = "Experiments in collaborative governance over the last several decades have transformed the way the public's business is getting done. Despite growing interest, empirical research on the performance of cross-boundary collaboration continues to be limited by conceptual and methodological challenges. This article extends previous research to develop a performance matrix for assessing the productivity of collaborative governance regimes (CGRs). Three performance levels (actions, outcomes, and adaptation) are addressed at three units of analysis (participant organizations, the CGR itself, and target goals), creating a performance matrix of nine critical dimensions of CGR productivity. This performance matrix is illustrated with a case study of a CGR operating on the U.S.-Mexico border.",
keywords = "Collaborative governance, Collaborative governance regimes, Evaluation, Evaluation, Performance, Productivity",
author = "Kirk Emerson and Tina Nabatchi",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "717--747",
journal = "Public Performance & Management Review",
issn = "1530-9576",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes

T2 - A performance matrix

AU - Emerson, Kirk

AU - Nabatchi, Tina

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Experiments in collaborative governance over the last several decades have transformed the way the public's business is getting done. Despite growing interest, empirical research on the performance of cross-boundary collaboration continues to be limited by conceptual and methodological challenges. This article extends previous research to develop a performance matrix for assessing the productivity of collaborative governance regimes (CGRs). Three performance levels (actions, outcomes, and adaptation) are addressed at three units of analysis (participant organizations, the CGR itself, and target goals), creating a performance matrix of nine critical dimensions of CGR productivity. This performance matrix is illustrated with a case study of a CGR operating on the U.S.-Mexico border.

AB - Experiments in collaborative governance over the last several decades have transformed the way the public's business is getting done. Despite growing interest, empirical research on the performance of cross-boundary collaboration continues to be limited by conceptual and methodological challenges. This article extends previous research to develop a performance matrix for assessing the productivity of collaborative governance regimes (CGRs). Three performance levels (actions, outcomes, and adaptation) are addressed at three units of analysis (participant organizations, the CGR itself, and target goals), creating a performance matrix of nine critical dimensions of CGR productivity. This performance matrix is illustrated with a case study of a CGR operating on the U.S.-Mexico border.

KW - Collaborative governance

KW - Collaborative governance regimes

KW - Evaluation

KW - Evaluation

KW - Performance

KW - Productivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943425562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943425562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016

DO - 10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 717

EP - 747

JO - Public Performance & Management Review

JF - Public Performance & Management Review

SN - 1530-9576

IS - 4

ER -