TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating mechanisms of proactive facilitation in cued recall
AU - Aue, William R.
AU - Criss, Amy H.
AU - Novak, Matthew D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The order of authorship reflects the relative contribution of the authors to the project. The presented data were part of WRA's doctoral dissertation. WRA is currently at the Department of Psychological Sciences at Purdue University. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number (#0951612) awarded to AHC. MDN is now at the Department of Applied Behavioral Science at the University of Kansas. Data and materials can be accessed through the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/6ph2z/.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - Confusion of older information with newer, similar information is a potent source of memory errors. The current project focused on understanding how memories for recent experiences interact, or interfere, with other related information. In the experiments, participants study multiple lists of pairs of items. Items from an initial study list (e.g., A-B) reappear on a second study list paired with new, other items (e.g., A-Br). Memory performance for A-Br pairs is contrasted with control pairs exclusive to the second study list (e.g., C-D). We observed that the correct recall of the second presentation of a target (Br) is better when cued by its partner (A) despite being studied with a different partner during the initial presentation; a phenomena called proactive facilitation. We examined multiple possible explanations for proactive facilitation, including whether proactive facilitation was driven by changes in response threshold, whether participants encoded the pairs with repeated items and associations better during the second study list, or whether participants spent more time searching memory for A-Br pairs. In general, the data appear to be most consistent with the idea that some items, when encountered a second time, are encoded more completely while others are not. Implications for models of memory are discussed.
AB - Confusion of older information with newer, similar information is a potent source of memory errors. The current project focused on understanding how memories for recent experiences interact, or interfere, with other related information. In the experiments, participants study multiple lists of pairs of items. Items from an initial study list (e.g., A-B) reappear on a second study list paired with new, other items (e.g., A-Br). Memory performance for A-Br pairs is contrasted with control pairs exclusive to the second study list (e.g., C-D). We observed that the correct recall of the second presentation of a target (Br) is better when cued by its partner (A) despite being studied with a different partner during the initial presentation; a phenomena called proactive facilitation. We examined multiple possible explanations for proactive facilitation, including whether proactive facilitation was driven by changes in response threshold, whether participants encoded the pairs with repeated items and associations better during the second study list, or whether participants spent more time searching memory for A-Br pairs. In general, the data appear to be most consistent with the idea that some items, when encountered a second time, are encoded more completely while others are not. Implications for models of memory are discussed.
KW - Associative memory
KW - Cued recall
KW - Episodic memory
KW - List discrimination
KW - Memory models
KW - Proactive facilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85004065426&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85004065426&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85004065426
SN - 0749-596X
VL - 94
SP - 103
EP - 118
JO - Journal of Memory and Language
JF - Journal of Memory and Language
ER -