TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence
T2 - Evidence from a survey of machine learning researchers
AU - Zhang, Baobao
AU - Anderljung, Markus
AU - Kahn, Lauren
AU - Dreksler, Noemi
AU - Horowitz, Michael C.
AU - Dafoe, Allan
N1 - Funding Information:
We want to thank Charlie Giattino, Emmie Hine, Tegan McCaslin, Kwan Yee Ng, and Catherine Peng for their research assistance. For helpful feedback and input, we want to thank: Catherine Aiken, Carolyn Ashurst, Miles Brundage, Rosie Campbell, Alexis Carlier, Jeff Ding, Owain Evans, Ben Garfinkel, Katja Grace, Ross Gruetzemacher, Jade Leung, Alex Lintz, Max Negele, Toby Shevlane, Brian Tse, Eva Vivalt, Waqar Zaidi, Remco Zwetsloot, our colleagues at our respective institutions, and our anonymous reviewers. We are also grateful for research support from the Center for Security and Emerging Technology at Georgetown University and the Berkeley Existential Risk Initiative. Funding: This research was supported by: the Ethics and Governance of AI Fund, the Open Philanthropy Project grant for “Oxford University – Research on the Global Politics of AI,” the Minerva Research Initiative under Grant #FA9550-18-1-0194, and the CIFAR Azrieli Global Scholars Program. The research reported here should solely be attributed to the authors; all errors are the responsibilities of the authors. Authors contributions: A.D., B.Z., M.A., and M.H. (in alphabetical order) designed the research and provided the conceptual framing of the work. B.Z. and M.A. handled the data acquisition. B.Z. and N.D. analyzed the data. A.D., B.Z., L.K., M.A., M.H., and N.D. wrote the paper. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Data and materials availability: Due to the data privacy promised to respondents and that our IRB applications noted that we would not share individual-level results, we cannot release the data in full. We made this decision because the population we are sampling from is a relatively small group of individuals, which increases the likelihood of respondents being identifiable from individual-level data. Instead, we have opted to report detailed breakdowns of the data by key demographics in the Appendix.
Publisher Copyright:
©2021 AI Access Foundation.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) researchers play an important role in the ethics and governance of AI, including through their work, advocacy, and choice of employment. Nevertheless, this influential group’s attitudes are not well understood, undermining our ability to discern consensuses or disagreements between AI/ML researchers. To examine these researchers’ views, we conducted a survey of those who published in two top AI/ML conferences (N = 524). We compare these results with those from a 2016 survey of AI/ML researchers (Grace et al., 2018) and a 2018 survey of the US public (Zhang & Dafoe, 2020). We find that AI/ML researchers place high levels of trust in international organizations and scientific organizations to shape the development and use of AI in the public interest; moderate trust in most Western tech companies; and low trust in national militaries, Chinese tech companies, and Facebook. While the respondents were overwhelmingly opposed to AI/ML researchers working on lethal autonomous weapons, they are less opposed to researchers working on other military applications of AI, particularly logistics algorithms. A strong majority of respondents think that AI safety research should be prioritized and that ML institutions should conduct pre-publication review to assess potential harms. Being closer to the technology itself, AI/ML researchers are well placed to highlight new risks and develop technical solutions, so this novel attempt to measure their attitudes has broad relevance. The findings should help to improve how researchers, private sector executives, and policymakers think about regulations, governance frameworks, guiding principles, and national and international governance strategies for AI.
AB - Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) researchers play an important role in the ethics and governance of AI, including through their work, advocacy, and choice of employment. Nevertheless, this influential group’s attitudes are not well understood, undermining our ability to discern consensuses or disagreements between AI/ML researchers. To examine these researchers’ views, we conducted a survey of those who published in two top AI/ML conferences (N = 524). We compare these results with those from a 2016 survey of AI/ML researchers (Grace et al., 2018) and a 2018 survey of the US public (Zhang & Dafoe, 2020). We find that AI/ML researchers place high levels of trust in international organizations and scientific organizations to shape the development and use of AI in the public interest; moderate trust in most Western tech companies; and low trust in national militaries, Chinese tech companies, and Facebook. While the respondents were overwhelmingly opposed to AI/ML researchers working on lethal autonomous weapons, they are less opposed to researchers working on other military applications of AI, particularly logistics algorithms. A strong majority of respondents think that AI safety research should be prioritized and that ML institutions should conduct pre-publication review to assess potential harms. Being closer to the technology itself, AI/ML researchers are well placed to highlight new risks and develop technical solutions, so this novel attempt to measure their attitudes has broad relevance. The findings should help to improve how researchers, private sector executives, and policymakers think about regulations, governance frameworks, guiding principles, and national and international governance strategies for AI.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113710203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85113710203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1613/JAIR.1.12895
DO - 10.1613/JAIR.1.12895
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85113710203
SN - 1076-9757
VL - 71
SP - 591
EP - 666
JO - Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
JF - Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
ER -