Estimation of head loss due to flow intrusion with inner ring spiral wound gaskets

Dale A. Rice, Jerry Waterland, David G Chandler

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The spiral wound gasket, developed after the turn of the 20th century, has been a popular gasket choice in the chemical, petrochemical, power and other industries. Since that time, metal gasket manufacturers have developed various designs for this popular type of gasket, using different metals and fillers in the windings. As a result, some subsequent spiral wound designs have included a metal inner ring inserted inboard of the windings, with the primary objective of preventing inward radial buckling of this gasket as well as to cover more of the flange face and minimize erosion between flange faces. However, the cost of fabricating the spiral wound increases in accordance with the metallurgy of the inner ring, as does the assembly bolt force required to fully compress this now captured spiral winding. Additionally, another recently identified drawback of the inner ring is the head loss due to the contraction of the flow area caused by the inner ring intrusion into the flow for certain nominal pipe sizes (NPS) and pipe schedules. For example, standard ASME B16.20 spiral wound gaskets with inner rings designed for ASME B16.5 Class 150 raised face flanges extend inside the flange and pipe wall to varying degrees for most Schedule 10 pipe between NPS 1/2'' and 6''. Such intrusions can impact the flow in the form of minor head loss resulting from intrusion of the inner ring. Flow equations for an orifice can be used to estimate head loss; such an empirical equation has been applied to estimate head loss associated with an inner ring style spiral wound gasket in various pipe schedules and NPSs. Total head loss for multiple flanges in a pipe network has also been calculated as the head losses from individual "inner ring orifices" are accumulated. Several scenarios were identified to indicate where spiral wound gaskets with an inner ring can not only lead to pipe network head loss but substantial hidden energy costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationComputer Technology and Bolted Joints
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Volume2
ISBN (Electronic)9780791850381
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016
EventASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP 2016 - Vancouver, Canada
Duration: Jul 17 2016Jul 21 2016

Other

OtherASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP 2016
CountryCanada
CityVancouver
Period7/17/167/21/16

Fingerprint

Gaskets
Pipe
Flanges
Orifices
Metals
Metallurgy
Bolts
Petrochemicals
Buckling
Fillers
Costs
Erosion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Rice, D. A., Waterland, J., & Chandler, D. G. (2016). Estimation of head loss due to flow intrusion with inner ring spiral wound gaskets. In Computer Technology and Bolted Joints (Vol. 2). [V002T02A011] American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2016-63614

Estimation of head loss due to flow intrusion with inner ring spiral wound gaskets. / Rice, Dale A.; Waterland, Jerry; Chandler, David G.

Computer Technology and Bolted Joints. Vol. 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2016. V002T02A011.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Rice, DA, Waterland, J & Chandler, DG 2016, Estimation of head loss due to flow intrusion with inner ring spiral wound gaskets. in Computer Technology and Bolted Joints. vol. 2, V002T02A011, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP 2016, Vancouver, Canada, 7/17/16. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2016-63614
Rice DA, Waterland J, Chandler DG. Estimation of head loss due to flow intrusion with inner ring spiral wound gaskets. In Computer Technology and Bolted Joints. Vol. 2. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 2016. V002T02A011 https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2016-63614
Rice, Dale A. ; Waterland, Jerry ; Chandler, David G. / Estimation of head loss due to flow intrusion with inner ring spiral wound gaskets. Computer Technology and Bolted Joints. Vol. 2 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2016.
@inproceedings{c7100855312147968344089252b281aa,
title = "Estimation of head loss due to flow intrusion with inner ring spiral wound gaskets",
abstract = "The spiral wound gasket, developed after the turn of the 20th century, has been a popular gasket choice in the chemical, petrochemical, power and other industries. Since that time, metal gasket manufacturers have developed various designs for this popular type of gasket, using different metals and fillers in the windings. As a result, some subsequent spiral wound designs have included a metal inner ring inserted inboard of the windings, with the primary objective of preventing inward radial buckling of this gasket as well as to cover more of the flange face and minimize erosion between flange faces. However, the cost of fabricating the spiral wound increases in accordance with the metallurgy of the inner ring, as does the assembly bolt force required to fully compress this now captured spiral winding. Additionally, another recently identified drawback of the inner ring is the head loss due to the contraction of the flow area caused by the inner ring intrusion into the flow for certain nominal pipe sizes (NPS) and pipe schedules. For example, standard ASME B16.20 spiral wound gaskets with inner rings designed for ASME B16.5 Class 150 raised face flanges extend inside the flange and pipe wall to varying degrees for most Schedule 10 pipe between NPS 1/2'' and 6''. Such intrusions can impact the flow in the form of minor head loss resulting from intrusion of the inner ring. Flow equations for an orifice can be used to estimate head loss; such an empirical equation has been applied to estimate head loss associated with an inner ring style spiral wound gasket in various pipe schedules and NPSs. Total head loss for multiple flanges in a pipe network has also been calculated as the head losses from individual {"}inner ring orifices{"} are accumulated. Several scenarios were identified to indicate where spiral wound gaskets with an inner ring can not only lead to pipe network head loss but substantial hidden energy costs.",
author = "Rice, {Dale A.} and Jerry Waterland and Chandler, {David G}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1115/PVP2016-63614",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
booktitle = "Computer Technology and Bolted Joints",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Estimation of head loss due to flow intrusion with inner ring spiral wound gaskets

AU - Rice, Dale A.

AU - Waterland, Jerry

AU - Chandler, David G

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The spiral wound gasket, developed after the turn of the 20th century, has been a popular gasket choice in the chemical, petrochemical, power and other industries. Since that time, metal gasket manufacturers have developed various designs for this popular type of gasket, using different metals and fillers in the windings. As a result, some subsequent spiral wound designs have included a metal inner ring inserted inboard of the windings, with the primary objective of preventing inward radial buckling of this gasket as well as to cover more of the flange face and minimize erosion between flange faces. However, the cost of fabricating the spiral wound increases in accordance with the metallurgy of the inner ring, as does the assembly bolt force required to fully compress this now captured spiral winding. Additionally, another recently identified drawback of the inner ring is the head loss due to the contraction of the flow area caused by the inner ring intrusion into the flow for certain nominal pipe sizes (NPS) and pipe schedules. For example, standard ASME B16.20 spiral wound gaskets with inner rings designed for ASME B16.5 Class 150 raised face flanges extend inside the flange and pipe wall to varying degrees for most Schedule 10 pipe between NPS 1/2'' and 6''. Such intrusions can impact the flow in the form of minor head loss resulting from intrusion of the inner ring. Flow equations for an orifice can be used to estimate head loss; such an empirical equation has been applied to estimate head loss associated with an inner ring style spiral wound gasket in various pipe schedules and NPSs. Total head loss for multiple flanges in a pipe network has also been calculated as the head losses from individual "inner ring orifices" are accumulated. Several scenarios were identified to indicate where spiral wound gaskets with an inner ring can not only lead to pipe network head loss but substantial hidden energy costs.

AB - The spiral wound gasket, developed after the turn of the 20th century, has been a popular gasket choice in the chemical, petrochemical, power and other industries. Since that time, metal gasket manufacturers have developed various designs for this popular type of gasket, using different metals and fillers in the windings. As a result, some subsequent spiral wound designs have included a metal inner ring inserted inboard of the windings, with the primary objective of preventing inward radial buckling of this gasket as well as to cover more of the flange face and minimize erosion between flange faces. However, the cost of fabricating the spiral wound increases in accordance with the metallurgy of the inner ring, as does the assembly bolt force required to fully compress this now captured spiral winding. Additionally, another recently identified drawback of the inner ring is the head loss due to the contraction of the flow area caused by the inner ring intrusion into the flow for certain nominal pipe sizes (NPS) and pipe schedules. For example, standard ASME B16.20 spiral wound gaskets with inner rings designed for ASME B16.5 Class 150 raised face flanges extend inside the flange and pipe wall to varying degrees for most Schedule 10 pipe between NPS 1/2'' and 6''. Such intrusions can impact the flow in the form of minor head loss resulting from intrusion of the inner ring. Flow equations for an orifice can be used to estimate head loss; such an empirical equation has been applied to estimate head loss associated with an inner ring style spiral wound gasket in various pipe schedules and NPSs. Total head loss for multiple flanges in a pipe network has also been calculated as the head losses from individual "inner ring orifices" are accumulated. Several scenarios were identified to indicate where spiral wound gaskets with an inner ring can not only lead to pipe network head loss but substantial hidden energy costs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006276844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006276844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/PVP2016-63614

DO - 10.1115/PVP2016-63614

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85006276844

VL - 2

BT - Computer Technology and Bolted Joints

PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

ER -