TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum to
T2 - Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts (Environ Resource Econ, (2010), 45, (133–155), 10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1)
AU - Johnstone, Nick
AU - Haščič, Ivan
AU - Popp, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - While replicating the study of Johnstone et al. (2010), Bruns and Kalthaus (2017, forthcoming) noted that a dummy variable for one country (New Zealand) is missing in the reported regressions for solar patents.1 The authors have re-estimated themodels including the dummy variable, and the corrected results are reported alongside the original results in the table below. The first part of the table corresponds to the results presented in Table 5 in the original paper. The second part of the table corresponds to the results presented in Table 6, where the policy dummies other than those of primary interest (feed-in tariffs and renewable energy certificates) are combined into a single variable to avoid potential multicollinearity. The third part of the table corresponds to the results presented in Table 7, where we also drop the Kyoto Protocol dummy variable.(Table presented.).
AB - While replicating the study of Johnstone et al. (2010), Bruns and Kalthaus (2017, forthcoming) noted that a dummy variable for one country (New Zealand) is missing in the reported regressions for solar patents.1 The authors have re-estimated themodels including the dummy variable, and the corrected results are reported alongside the original results in the table below. The first part of the table corresponds to the results presented in Table 5 in the original paper. The second part of the table corresponds to the results presented in Table 6, where the policy dummies other than those of primary interest (feed-in tariffs and renewable energy certificates) are combined into a single variable to avoid potential multicollinearity. The third part of the table corresponds to the results presented in Table 7, where we also drop the Kyoto Protocol dummy variable.(Table presented.).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027976700&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027976700&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10640-017-0176-x
DO - 10.1007/s10640-017-0176-x
M3 - Comment/Debate/Erratum
AN - SCOPUS:85027976700
SN - 0924-6460
VL - 68
SP - 441
EP - 444
JO - Environmental and Resource Economics
JF - Environmental and Resource Economics
IS - 2
ER -