Abstract
Examines several cases in which the US Supreme Court has seemingly failed to perceive the substantive content of federal environmental law by analysing: 1) the NEPAs treatment in Strycker's Bay Neighborhood Council v Karlen; and 2) the handling of two Clean Air Act cases in Train v NRDC and Union Electric v EPA. Concludes that these cases reveal a hostility to environmental values and a failure in the courts role to protect them. -from Authors
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-40 |
| Number of pages | 40 |
| Journal | Harvard Environmental Law Review |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - 1983 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Law