Encoding processes for recall and recognition

The effect of instructions and auxiliary task performance

Stephen A Maisto, Richard J. Dewaard, Marilyn E. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present experiment investigated the hypothesis that encoding for recall involves organization of input stimuli, while recognition entails encoding to achieve discriminability of individual items. Subjects were given either recall or recognition instructions, one or three presentations of a list of nouns, and did or did not perform an auxiliary task of repeating the words aloud at input. All subjects received recall and recognition tests. The results showed higher recall with recall instructions in the no-task condition. Oral repetition produced a decrement in recall following recall instructions, but had no effect with recognition instructions. Also, the auxiliary task had no effect on recall with recognition instructions, but with recognition instructions recognition performance was increased to the level of recall subjects. The results are discussed in terms of current models of recall and recognition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-130
Number of pages4
JournalBulletin of the Psychonomic Society
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1977
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Catalysis
  • Chemistry(all)

Cite this

Encoding processes for recall and recognition : The effect of instructions and auxiliary task performance. / Maisto, Stephen A; Dewaard, Richard J.; Miller, Marilyn E.

In: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1977, p. 127-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{729bd5d449fb4bdf80eef71200e6c31c,
title = "Encoding processes for recall and recognition: The effect of instructions and auxiliary task performance",
abstract = "The present experiment investigated the hypothesis that encoding for recall involves organization of input stimuli, while recognition entails encoding to achieve discriminability of individual items. Subjects were given either recall or recognition instructions, one or three presentations of a list of nouns, and did or did not perform an auxiliary task of repeating the words aloud at input. All subjects received recall and recognition tests. The results showed higher recall with recall instructions in the no-task condition. Oral repetition produced a decrement in recall following recall instructions, but had no effect with recognition instructions. Also, the auxiliary task had no effect on recall with recognition instructions, but with recognition instructions recognition performance was increased to the level of recall subjects. The results are discussed in terms of current models of recall and recognition.",
author = "Maisto, {Stephen A} and Dewaard, {Richard J.} and Miller, {Marilyn E.}",
year = "1977",
doi = "10.3758/BF03336951",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "127--130",
journal = "Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society",
issn = "0090-5054",
publisher = "Psychonomic Society Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Encoding processes for recall and recognition

T2 - The effect of instructions and auxiliary task performance

AU - Maisto, Stephen A

AU - Dewaard, Richard J.

AU - Miller, Marilyn E.

PY - 1977

Y1 - 1977

N2 - The present experiment investigated the hypothesis that encoding for recall involves organization of input stimuli, while recognition entails encoding to achieve discriminability of individual items. Subjects were given either recall or recognition instructions, one or three presentations of a list of nouns, and did or did not perform an auxiliary task of repeating the words aloud at input. All subjects received recall and recognition tests. The results showed higher recall with recall instructions in the no-task condition. Oral repetition produced a decrement in recall following recall instructions, but had no effect with recognition instructions. Also, the auxiliary task had no effect on recall with recognition instructions, but with recognition instructions recognition performance was increased to the level of recall subjects. The results are discussed in terms of current models of recall and recognition.

AB - The present experiment investigated the hypothesis that encoding for recall involves organization of input stimuli, while recognition entails encoding to achieve discriminability of individual items. Subjects were given either recall or recognition instructions, one or three presentations of a list of nouns, and did or did not perform an auxiliary task of repeating the words aloud at input. All subjects received recall and recognition tests. The results showed higher recall with recall instructions in the no-task condition. Oral repetition produced a decrement in recall following recall instructions, but had no effect with recognition instructions. Also, the auxiliary task had no effect on recall with recognition instructions, but with recognition instructions recognition performance was increased to the level of recall subjects. The results are discussed in terms of current models of recall and recognition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925909943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925909943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03336951

DO - 10.3758/BF03336951

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 127

EP - 130

JO - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

JF - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

SN - 0090-5054

IS - 2

ER -