Employees, Supervisors, and Workplace Mediation

Experiences of Justice and Settlement

Rebecca Nesbit, Tina Nabatchi, Lisa Blomgren Bingham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explores the experience of disputant-disputant interpersonal justice in workplace mediation in a public organization. The results show that there are significant differences between employees' and supervisors' experiences of disputant-disputant interpersonal justice. Moreover, the results indicate that the quality of participants' interactions in mediation is significantly related to the quality of the mediated outcome in terms of settlement or case resolution. When disputants experience interpersonal justice with each other during mediation, they are more likely to reach a full resolution to the dispute. When disputants corroborate each other's reports of their own behaviors during mediation, they are also more likely to achieve settlement of the mediation. Disputants who received an apology from the other party were more likely to report a settlement to the dispute. In sum, this field test supports the theory of disputant-disputant interpersonal justice and provides evidence that it is an important element in the mediated resolution of a workplace dispute.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)260-287
Number of pages28
JournalReview of Public Personnel Administration
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

mediation
workplace
justice
employee
experience
Employees
Work place
Supervisors
Mediation
Justice
organization
Interpersonal justice
interaction
evidence
Dispute

Keywords

  • grievance issues
  • interactional justice
  • mediation
  • workplace dispute resolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Employees, Supervisors, and Workplace Mediation : Experiences of Justice and Settlement. / Nesbit, Rebecca; Nabatchi, Tina; Bingham, Lisa Blomgren.

In: Review of Public Personnel Administration, Vol. 32, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 260-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{58e8ad6246364c21ac4a7b98bad96e98,
title = "Employees, Supervisors, and Workplace Mediation: Experiences of Justice and Settlement",
abstract = "This study explores the experience of disputant-disputant interpersonal justice in workplace mediation in a public organization. The results show that there are significant differences between employees' and supervisors' experiences of disputant-disputant interpersonal justice. Moreover, the results indicate that the quality of participants' interactions in mediation is significantly related to the quality of the mediated outcome in terms of settlement or case resolution. When disputants experience interpersonal justice with each other during mediation, they are more likely to reach a full resolution to the dispute. When disputants corroborate each other's reports of their own behaviors during mediation, they are also more likely to achieve settlement of the mediation. Disputants who received an apology from the other party were more likely to report a settlement to the dispute. In sum, this field test supports the theory of disputant-disputant interpersonal justice and provides evidence that it is an important element in the mediated resolution of a workplace dispute.",
keywords = "grievance issues, interactional justice, mediation, workplace dispute resolution",
author = "Rebecca Nesbit and Tina Nabatchi and Bingham, {Lisa Blomgren}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1177/0734371X12436981",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "260--287",
journal = "Review of Public Personnel Administration",
issn = "0734-371X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Employees, Supervisors, and Workplace Mediation

T2 - Experiences of Justice and Settlement

AU - Nesbit, Rebecca

AU - Nabatchi, Tina

AU - Bingham, Lisa Blomgren

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - This study explores the experience of disputant-disputant interpersonal justice in workplace mediation in a public organization. The results show that there are significant differences between employees' and supervisors' experiences of disputant-disputant interpersonal justice. Moreover, the results indicate that the quality of participants' interactions in mediation is significantly related to the quality of the mediated outcome in terms of settlement or case resolution. When disputants experience interpersonal justice with each other during mediation, they are more likely to reach a full resolution to the dispute. When disputants corroborate each other's reports of their own behaviors during mediation, they are also more likely to achieve settlement of the mediation. Disputants who received an apology from the other party were more likely to report a settlement to the dispute. In sum, this field test supports the theory of disputant-disputant interpersonal justice and provides evidence that it is an important element in the mediated resolution of a workplace dispute.

AB - This study explores the experience of disputant-disputant interpersonal justice in workplace mediation in a public organization. The results show that there are significant differences between employees' and supervisors' experiences of disputant-disputant interpersonal justice. Moreover, the results indicate that the quality of participants' interactions in mediation is significantly related to the quality of the mediated outcome in terms of settlement or case resolution. When disputants experience interpersonal justice with each other during mediation, they are more likely to reach a full resolution to the dispute. When disputants corroborate each other's reports of their own behaviors during mediation, they are also more likely to achieve settlement of the mediation. Disputants who received an apology from the other party were more likely to report a settlement to the dispute. In sum, this field test supports the theory of disputant-disputant interpersonal justice and provides evidence that it is an important element in the mediated resolution of a workplace dispute.

KW - grievance issues

KW - interactional justice

KW - mediation

KW - workplace dispute resolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864704845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864704845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0734371X12436981

DO - 10.1177/0734371X12436981

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 260

EP - 287

JO - Review of Public Personnel Administration

JF - Review of Public Personnel Administration

SN - 0734-371X

IS - 3

ER -