Effects of problem formulation and process structures on performance and perceptions in a GDSS environment: An experiment

Murali Venkatesh, Bayard E. Wynne

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This laboratory study examined the effects of problem formulation and process structuring on group performance and member perceptions within a GDSS environment on a problem-solving task. All groups solved the problem. Control groups had no preceding formulation stage. Half the non-control groups received a simple advocacy treatment, while others were also given a specific formulation heuristic to follow. Full heuristic groups were,' significantly better on formulation score and appeared to have an edge on solution score as well. The simple advocacy groups had the more favorable process and outcome perceptions; worst perceptions were expressed by the full heuristic groups. Speculation is offered about GDSS structural restrictiveness and task perceptions as well as about the link between problem formulation and solution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number184188
Pages (from-to)564-572
Number of pages9
JournalProceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Volume3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991
Event24th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 1991 - Kauai, United States
Duration: Jan 8 1991Jan 11 1991

Fingerprint

Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{18bdce75d37d46ae947903d5190fd0c9,
title = "Effects of problem formulation and process structures on performance and perceptions in a GDSS environment: An experiment",
abstract = "This laboratory study examined the effects of problem formulation and process structuring on group performance and member perceptions within a GDSS environment on a problem-solving task. All groups solved the problem. Control groups had no preceding formulation stage. Half the non-control groups received a simple advocacy treatment, while others were also given a specific formulation heuristic to follow. Full heuristic groups were,' significantly better on formulation score and appeared to have an edge on solution score as well. The simple advocacy groups had the more favorable process and outcome perceptions; worst perceptions were expressed by the full heuristic groups. Speculation is offered about GDSS structural restrictiveness and task perceptions as well as about the link between problem formulation and solution.",
author = "Murali Venkatesh and Wynne, {Bayard E.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/HICSS.1991.184188",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "564--572",
journal = "Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences",
issn = "1530-1605",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of problem formulation and process structures on performance and perceptions in a GDSS environment

T2 - An experiment

AU - Venkatesh, Murali

AU - Wynne, Bayard E.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - This laboratory study examined the effects of problem formulation and process structuring on group performance and member perceptions within a GDSS environment on a problem-solving task. All groups solved the problem. Control groups had no preceding formulation stage. Half the non-control groups received a simple advocacy treatment, while others were also given a specific formulation heuristic to follow. Full heuristic groups were,' significantly better on formulation score and appeared to have an edge on solution score as well. The simple advocacy groups had the more favorable process and outcome perceptions; worst perceptions were expressed by the full heuristic groups. Speculation is offered about GDSS structural restrictiveness and task perceptions as well as about the link between problem formulation and solution.

AB - This laboratory study examined the effects of problem formulation and process structuring on group performance and member perceptions within a GDSS environment on a problem-solving task. All groups solved the problem. Control groups had no preceding formulation stage. Half the non-control groups received a simple advocacy treatment, while others were also given a specific formulation heuristic to follow. Full heuristic groups were,' significantly better on formulation score and appeared to have an edge on solution score as well. The simple advocacy groups had the more favorable process and outcome perceptions; worst perceptions were expressed by the full heuristic groups. Speculation is offered about GDSS structural restrictiveness and task perceptions as well as about the link between problem formulation and solution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965506565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965506565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/HICSS.1991.184188

DO - 10.1109/HICSS.1991.184188

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84965506565

VL - 3

SP - 564

EP - 572

JO - Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

JF - Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

SN - 1530-1605

M1 - 184188

ER -