TY - JOUR
T1 - Ecological Origins of Freedom
T2 - Pathogens, Heat Stress, and Frontier Topography Predict More Vertical but Less Horizontal Governmental Restriction
AU - Conway, Lucian Gideon
AU - Bongard, Kate
AU - Plaut, Victoria
AU - Gornick, Laura Janelle
AU - Dodds, Daniel P.
AU - Giresi, Thomas
AU - Tweed, Roger G.
AU - Repke, Meredith A.
AU - Houck, Shannon C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © 2017 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - What kinds of physical environments make for free societies? The present research investigates the effect of three different types of ecological stressors (climate stress, pathogen stress, and frontier topography) on two measurements of governmental restriction: Vertical restriction involves select persons imposing asymmetrical laws on others, while horizontal restriction involves laws that restrict most members of a society equally. Investigation 1 validates our measurements of vertical and horizontal restriction. Investigation 2 demonstrates that, across both U.S. states and a sample of nations, ecological stressors tend to cause more vertically restrictive societies but less horizontally restrictive societies. Investigation 3 demonstrates that assortative sociality partially mediates ecological stress→restriction relationships across nations, but not in U.S. states. Although some stressor-specific effects emerged (most notably, cold stress consistently showed effects in the opposite direction), these results in the main suggest that ecological stress simultaneously creates opposing pressures that push freedom in two different directions.
AB - What kinds of physical environments make for free societies? The present research investigates the effect of three different types of ecological stressors (climate stress, pathogen stress, and frontier topography) on two measurements of governmental restriction: Vertical restriction involves select persons imposing asymmetrical laws on others, while horizontal restriction involves laws that restrict most members of a society equally. Investigation 1 validates our measurements of vertical and horizontal restriction. Investigation 2 demonstrates that, across both U.S. states and a sample of nations, ecological stressors tend to cause more vertically restrictive societies but less horizontally restrictive societies. Investigation 3 demonstrates that assortative sociality partially mediates ecological stress→restriction relationships across nations, but not in U.S. states. Although some stressor-specific effects emerged (most notably, cold stress consistently showed effects in the opposite direction), these results in the main suggest that ecological stress simultaneously creates opposing pressures that push freedom in two different directions.
KW - horizontal
KW - individualism/collectivism
KW - legal restriction
KW - vertical
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028955104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028955104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0146167217713192
DO - 10.1177/0146167217713192
M3 - Article
C2 - 28918717
AN - SCOPUS:85028955104
SN - 0146-1672
VL - 43
SP - 1378
EP - 1398
JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
IS - 10
ER -