Drawing lines: FEMA and the politics of mapping flood zones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Flooding is the most common and damaging of all natural disasters in USA, and climate change is exacerbating the problem. Accurate flood maps are critical to communicating flood risk to vulnerable populations, to mitigating and adapting to floods, and to the functioning of the federal flood insurance program. Yet, we know little about how the mapping process works in practice. This article argues that politics can shape the remapping process in ways that leave communities vulnerable. Because mapping takes place within the context of the National Flood Insurance Program, the conversation at the local level often centers on the costs of revising the flood hazard zones rather than the risks associated with flooding. This can lead to less than optimal responses by individuals and communities, and suggests that the USA is not adequately preparing for future climate change impacts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalClimatic Change
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

politics
flooding
climate change
natural disaster
hazard
cost
programme
insurance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Drawing lines : FEMA and the politics of mapping flood zones. / Pralle, Sarah B.

In: Climatic Change, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b6e55ed15974cbb8ad424736d5f8151,
title = "Drawing lines: FEMA and the politics of mapping flood zones",
abstract = "Flooding is the most common and damaging of all natural disasters in USA, and climate change is exacerbating the problem. Accurate flood maps are critical to communicating flood risk to vulnerable populations, to mitigating and adapting to floods, and to the functioning of the federal flood insurance program. Yet, we know little about how the mapping process works in practice. This article argues that politics can shape the remapping process in ways that leave communities vulnerable. Because mapping takes place within the context of the National Flood Insurance Program, the conversation at the local level often centers on the costs of revising the flood hazard zones rather than the risks associated with flooding. This can lead to less than optimal responses by individuals and communities, and suggests that the USA is not adequately preparing for future climate change impacts.",
author = "Pralle, {Sarah B}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10584-018-2287-y",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Climatic Change",
issn = "0165-0009",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drawing lines

T2 - FEMA and the politics of mapping flood zones

AU - Pralle, Sarah B

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Flooding is the most common and damaging of all natural disasters in USA, and climate change is exacerbating the problem. Accurate flood maps are critical to communicating flood risk to vulnerable populations, to mitigating and adapting to floods, and to the functioning of the federal flood insurance program. Yet, we know little about how the mapping process works in practice. This article argues that politics can shape the remapping process in ways that leave communities vulnerable. Because mapping takes place within the context of the National Flood Insurance Program, the conversation at the local level often centers on the costs of revising the flood hazard zones rather than the risks associated with flooding. This can lead to less than optimal responses by individuals and communities, and suggests that the USA is not adequately preparing for future climate change impacts.

AB - Flooding is the most common and damaging of all natural disasters in USA, and climate change is exacerbating the problem. Accurate flood maps are critical to communicating flood risk to vulnerable populations, to mitigating and adapting to floods, and to the functioning of the federal flood insurance program. Yet, we know little about how the mapping process works in practice. This article argues that politics can shape the remapping process in ways that leave communities vulnerable. Because mapping takes place within the context of the National Flood Insurance Program, the conversation at the local level often centers on the costs of revising the flood hazard zones rather than the risks associated with flooding. This can lead to less than optimal responses by individuals and communities, and suggests that the USA is not adequately preparing for future climate change impacts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053511034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053511034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10584-018-2287-y

DO - 10.1007/s10584-018-2287-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053511034

JO - Climatic Change

JF - Climatic Change

SN - 0165-0009

ER -