Domestic violence policy, forensic mental health, and the revival of rehabilitation

Crossroads or cross purposes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Current domestic violence policy was shaped both by second wave feminist initiatives formulated in the 1970s and 1980s and by the culturally conservative concerns of the emerging punitive era. The policy framework that has emerged from the intersection of the seemingly incompatible positions of conservative views of crime and progressive feminist views of liberation in fact has come to resemble more conservative social control than progressive feminism. In spite of known empirical links between domestic violence and psychological disorders, this policy framework ignores many of the principles of forensic mental health practice. Growing awareness of the costs and failures of mass incarceration and the overcriminalization of certain behaviors is leading to a reconsideration of the role of mental health problems in crime overall. These trends may foreshadow a return to a more rehabilitative view of crime and corrections, presenting domestic violence policy with an opportunity to move toward a standpoint more scientific, more compassionate, and more effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)315-328
Number of pages14
JournalPartner Abuse
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Domestic Violence
domestic violence
rehabilitation
Crime
mental health
offense
Mental Health
Feminism
social control
liberation
feminism
trend
Psychology
costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
Psychiatric Rehabilitation

Keywords

  • Corrections
  • Domestic violence
  • Mental health
  • Social policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)
  • Law

Cite this

@article{404351b031594d32bf32bfe793bfd84d,
title = "Domestic violence policy, forensic mental health, and the revival of rehabilitation: Crossroads or cross purposes",
abstract = "Current domestic violence policy was shaped both by second wave feminist initiatives formulated in the 1970s and 1980s and by the culturally conservative concerns of the emerging punitive era. The policy framework that has emerged from the intersection of the seemingly incompatible positions of conservative views of crime and progressive feminist views of liberation in fact has come to resemble more conservative social control than progressive feminism. In spite of known empirical links between domestic violence and psychological disorders, this policy framework ignores many of the principles of forensic mental health practice. Growing awareness of the costs and failures of mass incarceration and the overcriminalization of certain behaviors is leading to a reconsideration of the role of mental health problems in crime overall. These trends may foreshadow a return to a more rehabilitative view of crime and corrections, presenting domestic violence policy with an opportunity to move toward a standpoint more scientific, more compassionate, and more effective.",
keywords = "Corrections, Domestic violence, Mental health, Social policy",
author = "Corvo, {Kenneth N} and Spitzmueller, {Matthew C}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1891/1946-6560.8.3.315",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "315--328",
journal = "Partner Abuse",
issn = "1946-6560",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Domestic violence policy, forensic mental health, and the revival of rehabilitation

T2 - Crossroads or cross purposes

AU - Corvo, Kenneth N

AU - Spitzmueller, Matthew C

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Current domestic violence policy was shaped both by second wave feminist initiatives formulated in the 1970s and 1980s and by the culturally conservative concerns of the emerging punitive era. The policy framework that has emerged from the intersection of the seemingly incompatible positions of conservative views of crime and progressive feminist views of liberation in fact has come to resemble more conservative social control than progressive feminism. In spite of known empirical links between domestic violence and psychological disorders, this policy framework ignores many of the principles of forensic mental health practice. Growing awareness of the costs and failures of mass incarceration and the overcriminalization of certain behaviors is leading to a reconsideration of the role of mental health problems in crime overall. These trends may foreshadow a return to a more rehabilitative view of crime and corrections, presenting domestic violence policy with an opportunity to move toward a standpoint more scientific, more compassionate, and more effective.

AB - Current domestic violence policy was shaped both by second wave feminist initiatives formulated in the 1970s and 1980s and by the culturally conservative concerns of the emerging punitive era. The policy framework that has emerged from the intersection of the seemingly incompatible positions of conservative views of crime and progressive feminist views of liberation in fact has come to resemble more conservative social control than progressive feminism. In spite of known empirical links between domestic violence and psychological disorders, this policy framework ignores many of the principles of forensic mental health practice. Growing awareness of the costs and failures of mass incarceration and the overcriminalization of certain behaviors is leading to a reconsideration of the role of mental health problems in crime overall. These trends may foreshadow a return to a more rehabilitative view of crime and corrections, presenting domestic violence policy with an opportunity to move toward a standpoint more scientific, more compassionate, and more effective.

KW - Corrections

KW - Domestic violence

KW - Mental health

KW - Social policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037035263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037035263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1891/1946-6560.8.3.315

DO - 10.1891/1946-6560.8.3.315

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 315

EP - 328

JO - Partner Abuse

JF - Partner Abuse

SN - 1946-6560

IS - 3

ER -