Does Violent Secessionism Work?

Ryan Griffiths, Louis M. Wasser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent research suggests that the strategic use of violence may increase a group’s chance of gaining independence. We investigate this topic using comprehensive data on all secessionist movements between 1900 and 2006 and an original data set on the institutional and extrainstitutional methods that secessionists have used from 1946 to 2011. Our analysis yields several important findings. First, strategy depends on context. Not all secessionist movements are the same, and many have legal and/or institutional routes to independence that shape the methods that they employ. Second, no secessionist movement challenging a contiguous state has won its sovereignty without using institutional methods, either exclusively or in combination with extrainstitutional methods. Finally, we identify four successful combinations of secessionist methods and discuss how these movements develop in relation to their strategic setting. Overall, we find no evidence that violence helps a secessionist movement to gain independence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

violence
sovereignty
evidence
Group
Sovereignty

Keywords

  • civil wars
  • conflict
  • internal armed conflict
  • rebellion
  • separatism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Does Violent Secessionism Work? / Griffiths, Ryan; Wasser, Louis M.

In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d5909148d4254c23a1752d660ded4492,
title = "Does Violent Secessionism Work?",
abstract = "Recent research suggests that the strategic use of violence may increase a group’s chance of gaining independence. We investigate this topic using comprehensive data on all secessionist movements between 1900 and 2006 and an original data set on the institutional and extrainstitutional methods that secessionists have used from 1946 to 2011. Our analysis yields several important findings. First, strategy depends on context. Not all secessionist movements are the same, and many have legal and/or institutional routes to independence that shape the methods that they employ. Second, no secessionist movement challenging a contiguous state has won its sovereignty without using institutional methods, either exclusively or in combination with extrainstitutional methods. Finally, we identify four successful combinations of secessionist methods and discuss how these movements develop in relation to their strategic setting. Overall, we find no evidence that violence helps a secessionist movement to gain independence.",
keywords = "civil wars, conflict, internal armed conflict, rebellion, separatism",
author = "Ryan Griffiths and Wasser, {Louis M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022002718783032",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Conflict Resolution",
issn = "0022-0027",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Violent Secessionism Work?

AU - Griffiths, Ryan

AU - Wasser, Louis M.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Recent research suggests that the strategic use of violence may increase a group’s chance of gaining independence. We investigate this topic using comprehensive data on all secessionist movements between 1900 and 2006 and an original data set on the institutional and extrainstitutional methods that secessionists have used from 1946 to 2011. Our analysis yields several important findings. First, strategy depends on context. Not all secessionist movements are the same, and many have legal and/or institutional routes to independence that shape the methods that they employ. Second, no secessionist movement challenging a contiguous state has won its sovereignty without using institutional methods, either exclusively or in combination with extrainstitutional methods. Finally, we identify four successful combinations of secessionist methods and discuss how these movements develop in relation to their strategic setting. Overall, we find no evidence that violence helps a secessionist movement to gain independence.

AB - Recent research suggests that the strategic use of violence may increase a group’s chance of gaining independence. We investigate this topic using comprehensive data on all secessionist movements between 1900 and 2006 and an original data set on the institutional and extrainstitutional methods that secessionists have used from 1946 to 2011. Our analysis yields several important findings. First, strategy depends on context. Not all secessionist movements are the same, and many have legal and/or institutional routes to independence that shape the methods that they employ. Second, no secessionist movement challenging a contiguous state has won its sovereignty without using institutional methods, either exclusively or in combination with extrainstitutional methods. Finally, we identify four successful combinations of secessionist methods and discuss how these movements develop in relation to their strategic setting. Overall, we find no evidence that violence helps a secessionist movement to gain independence.

KW - civil wars

KW - conflict

KW - internal armed conflict

KW - rebellion

KW - separatism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049776788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049776788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022002718783032

DO - 10.1177/0022002718783032

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049776788

JO - Journal of Conflict Resolution

JF - Journal of Conflict Resolution

SN - 0022-0027

ER -