Does the network centrality of government actors matter? Examining the role of government organizations in aquaculture partnerships

William Resh, Saba Siddiki, Will R. Mcconnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The growth in the use of collaborative governance arrangements has been accompanied by burgeoning scholarship in the field of public affairs that seeks to understand the benefits of engaging diverse stakeholders in common venues. However, few scholars have formally assessed the role of government actors in facilitating outcomes for individual participants in such efforts. Moreover, little work on collaborative governance examines how individual incentives and barriers to collective action are formed within the nested nature of these contexts. We contribute to the study of collaborative governance by formally investigating how the relative centrality of government actors in collaborative policy-making venues affects individual relationship building and learning for participants therein. We find that government actor centrality is positively associated with relationship building and learning. However, in testing two different conceptualizations of "centrality," we find that the definition of this construct clearly matters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)584-609
Number of pages26
JournalReview of Policy Research
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aquaculture
  • Collaborative governance
  • Consultation
  • Marine policy
  • Networks
  • Public engagement
  • Public policy process

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Public Administration
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does the network centrality of government actors matter? Examining the role of government organizations in aquaculture partnerships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this