Abstract
Two studies examine a possible consequence–namely, unwanted reactions to psychological research on wrongdoing–if laypeople perceive psychologists to have liberal tendencies. Study 1 replicated previous research by showing that when psychologists presented findings demonstrating situational (compared to dispositional or interactionist) influences on wrongdoing, they were perceived as assigning less responsibility to perpetrators. Further, this effect was stronger among participants who perceived psychologists to be politically liberal. Study 2 revealed that when psychologists were explicitly identified as liberals, participants believed they would downplay perpetrator responsibility across the board, but particularly when the responsibility attributional account was situational. Psychologists should be aware that laypeople’s perception of their political leanings could lead to discrepant construal of psychologists’ actual perspectives on human behavior.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 230-245 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Social Influence |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 1 2016 |
Keywords
- Political ideology
- responsibility attribution
- wrongdoing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology