Diversity in Democracy: Accommodating Religious Particularity in Largely Secular Legal Systems

Mirjam Künkler, Yüksel Sezgin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The articles assembled in this symposium share their roots in a workshop we organized at the International Institute for the Sociology of Law (IISJ) in Onati, Spain, in June 2011. The workshop, titled “Legal Pluralism and Democracy. When Does Legal Pluralism Enhance, When Does It Erode Legitimacy of and Trust in Democratic Institutions?” examined the consequences of legal pluralism for various facets of democracy, from human rights and political equality to issues of stateness, legitimacy, and self-determination. Half of the papers discussed the application of customary law in pluri-legal systems, particularly in Africa and South America, while the other half dealt with the application of religious law, especially in Muslim-majority countries as well as Israel and India. Other papers presented at the workshop have been published in the IISJ's “Oñati Socio-Legal Series” on the Social Science Research Network and are available for download at http://papers.ssrn.com/so13/JELJOUR_Results.cfm?form_name=journalbrowse&journal_id=1605943. The three articles featured in this symposium address how the law may take account of diversity in the face of the democratic promise of universal rights standards: they probe the question of how to accommodate cultural particularity while also delivering upon the promise of universal and equal citizenship. Both are crucial sources of legitimacy of and trust in democratic political systems, even while they are also often mutually exclusive standards.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-340
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Law and Religion
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Religious studies
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diversity in Democracy: Accommodating Religious Particularity in Largely Secular Legal Systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this