Discursive practices in talking problems during a school–family meeting

Richard Buttny, Sandra Kellogg Rath

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter examines a meeting between family members and a high-school co-director. The meeting was called for a returning student who was newly a mother. What is interesting about this is how the talk extends into the personal matters of the family, such as: interpersonal relationships with the father of the baby, accountability for the pregnancy and birth control. We look at the discursive practices in formulating problems and in accounting for such versions. In particular, we focus on how participants, at times, orient to and manage these problems as delicate matters. In talking problems, persons are invariably positioned through their own or other's accounts (Davies and Harré, 1999). How one is positioned can be especially important in institutional contexts, such as a school. Institutional representatives typically have far greater knowledge of institutional norms and practices than lay clients (Gumperz, 1982). We need to examine how this asymmetry of knowledge, access and power plays out in communication events such as meetings or interviews. For instance, a recent study of a high school–family meeting for a teenage mother's return to school found that this student was positioned in contradictory ways, by conflicting category predicates – as being a mother, a fifteen-year-old with friends, needing to do homework (see also Buttny, 2004: ch. 2). Such conflicting positionings were oriented to by participants as a possible problem: for the family as something that could be resolved through the grandmother's help, while for the school as something that may make graduating difficult and may necessitate her transferring schools.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDiscursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages247-262
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9780511611216
ISBN (Print)9780521849296
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Mothers
Institutional Practice
Students
Social Responsibility
Contraception
Fathers
Communication
Interviews
Pregnancy
Power (Psychology)
Grandparents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Buttny, R., & Rath, S. K. (2007). Discursive practices in talking problems during a school–family meeting. In Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction (pp. 247-262). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611216.013

Discursive practices in talking problems during a school–family meeting. / Buttny, Richard; Rath, Sandra Kellogg.

Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 247-262.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Buttny, R & Rath, SK 2007, Discursive practices in talking problems during a school–family meeting. in Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge University Press, pp. 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611216.013
Buttny R, Rath SK. Discursive practices in talking problems during a school–family meeting. In Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge University Press. 2007. p. 247-262 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611216.013
Buttny, Richard ; Rath, Sandra Kellogg. / Discursive practices in talking problems during a school–family meeting. Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge University Press, 2007. pp. 247-262
@inbook{22beb99dfa05492f80980543bd72b8e0,
title = "Discursive practices in talking problems during a school–family meeting",
abstract = "This chapter examines a meeting between family members and a high-school co-director. The meeting was called for a returning student who was newly a mother. What is interesting about this is how the talk extends into the personal matters of the family, such as: interpersonal relationships with the father of the baby, accountability for the pregnancy and birth control. We look at the discursive practices in formulating problems and in accounting for such versions. In particular, we focus on how participants, at times, orient to and manage these problems as delicate matters. In talking problems, persons are invariably positioned through their own or other's accounts (Davies and Harr{\'e}, 1999). How one is positioned can be especially important in institutional contexts, such as a school. Institutional representatives typically have far greater knowledge of institutional norms and practices than lay clients (Gumperz, 1982). We need to examine how this asymmetry of knowledge, access and power plays out in communication events such as meetings or interviews. For instance, a recent study of a high school–family meeting for a teenage mother's return to school found that this student was positioned in contradictory ways, by conflicting category predicates – as being a mother, a fifteen-year-old with friends, needing to do homework (see also Buttny, 2004: ch. 2). Such conflicting positionings were oriented to by participants as a possible problem: for the family as something that could be resolved through the grandmother's help, while for the school as something that may make graduating difficult and may necessitate her transferring schools.",
author = "Richard Buttny and Rath, {Sandra Kellogg}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511611216.013",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521849296",
pages = "247--262",
booktitle = "Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Discursive practices in talking problems during a school–family meeting

AU - Buttny, Richard

AU - Rath, Sandra Kellogg

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - This chapter examines a meeting between family members and a high-school co-director. The meeting was called for a returning student who was newly a mother. What is interesting about this is how the talk extends into the personal matters of the family, such as: interpersonal relationships with the father of the baby, accountability for the pregnancy and birth control. We look at the discursive practices in formulating problems and in accounting for such versions. In particular, we focus on how participants, at times, orient to and manage these problems as delicate matters. In talking problems, persons are invariably positioned through their own or other's accounts (Davies and Harré, 1999). How one is positioned can be especially important in institutional contexts, such as a school. Institutional representatives typically have far greater knowledge of institutional norms and practices than lay clients (Gumperz, 1982). We need to examine how this asymmetry of knowledge, access and power plays out in communication events such as meetings or interviews. For instance, a recent study of a high school–family meeting for a teenage mother's return to school found that this student was positioned in contradictory ways, by conflicting category predicates – as being a mother, a fifteen-year-old with friends, needing to do homework (see also Buttny, 2004: ch. 2). Such conflicting positionings were oriented to by participants as a possible problem: for the family as something that could be resolved through the grandmother's help, while for the school as something that may make graduating difficult and may necessitate her transferring schools.

AB - This chapter examines a meeting between family members and a high-school co-director. The meeting was called for a returning student who was newly a mother. What is interesting about this is how the talk extends into the personal matters of the family, such as: interpersonal relationships with the father of the baby, accountability for the pregnancy and birth control. We look at the discursive practices in formulating problems and in accounting for such versions. In particular, we focus on how participants, at times, orient to and manage these problems as delicate matters. In talking problems, persons are invariably positioned through their own or other's accounts (Davies and Harré, 1999). How one is positioned can be especially important in institutional contexts, such as a school. Institutional representatives typically have far greater knowledge of institutional norms and practices than lay clients (Gumperz, 1982). We need to examine how this asymmetry of knowledge, access and power plays out in communication events such as meetings or interviews. For instance, a recent study of a high school–family meeting for a teenage mother's return to school found that this student was positioned in contradictory ways, by conflicting category predicates – as being a mother, a fifteen-year-old with friends, needing to do homework (see also Buttny, 2004: ch. 2). Such conflicting positionings were oriented to by participants as a possible problem: for the family as something that could be resolved through the grandmother's help, while for the school as something that may make graduating difficult and may necessitate her transferring schools.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927039200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927039200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511611216.013

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511611216.013

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84927039200

SN - 9780521849296

SP - 247

EP - 262

BT - Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -