TY - JOUR
T1 - Discourses of trans-ethnic narod in postwar Bosnia and Herzegovina
AU - Hromadžić, Azra
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by grants from the American Association of University Women, the American Council of Learned Societies, the New Europe College, Penfield, the Social Science Research Council, the Spencer Foundation, and the United States Institute of Peace. I am extremely grateful to Genevra Murray for her intellectual and editing contributions. I thankfully acknowledge the help of three anonymous reviewers, especially reviewer 2, in regard to various parts of this article.
Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/3
Y1 - 2013/3
N2 - The processes of peace-building and democratization in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) were instituted on 14 December 1995 by the Dayton Accords, which brought an end to the Bosnian War. While claiming their objectives to be reconciliation, democracy, and ethnic pluralism, the accords inscribed in law the ethnic partition between Bosnian Serbs, Croats, and Muslims by granting rights to "people" based on their identification as "ethnic collectivities." This powerful tension at the heart of "democratization" efforts has been central to what has transpired over the past 16 years. My account uses ethnographic methods and anthropological analysis to document how the ethnic emphasis of the local nationalist projects and international integration policies is working in practice to flatten the multilayered discourses of nationhood in BiH. As a result of these processes, long-standing notions of trans-ethnic nationhood in BiH lost their political visibility and potency. In this article I explore how trans-ethnic narod or nation(hood) - as a space of popular politics, cultural interconnectedness, morality, political critique, and economic victimhood - still lingers in the memories and practices of ordinary Bosnians and Herzegovinians, thus powerfully informing their political subjectivities.
AB - The processes of peace-building and democratization in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) were instituted on 14 December 1995 by the Dayton Accords, which brought an end to the Bosnian War. While claiming their objectives to be reconciliation, democracy, and ethnic pluralism, the accords inscribed in law the ethnic partition between Bosnian Serbs, Croats, and Muslims by granting rights to "people" based on their identification as "ethnic collectivities." This powerful tension at the heart of "democratization" efforts has been central to what has transpired over the past 16 years. My account uses ethnographic methods and anthropological analysis to document how the ethnic emphasis of the local nationalist projects and international integration policies is working in practice to flatten the multilayered discourses of nationhood in BiH. As a result of these processes, long-standing notions of trans-ethnic nationhood in BiH lost their political visibility and potency. In this article I explore how trans-ethnic narod or nation(hood) - as a space of popular politics, cultural interconnectedness, morality, political critique, and economic victimhood - still lingers in the memories and practices of ordinary Bosnians and Herzegovinians, thus powerfully informing their political subjectivities.
KW - Bosnia and Herzegovina
KW - Mostar
KW - consociational democracy
KW - narod
KW - trans-ethnic nationhood
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875862361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875862361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00905992.2012.747503
DO - 10.1080/00905992.2012.747503
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84875862361
SN - 0090-5992
VL - 41
SP - 259
EP - 275
JO - Nationalities Papers
JF - Nationalities Papers
IS - 2
ER -