TY - JOUR
T1 - Differential use of elementary science kits
AU - Jones, Gail
AU - Robertson, Laura
AU - Gardner, Grant E.
AU - Dotger, Sharon
AU - Blanchard, Margaret R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Curriculum reform in the 1960s focussed on inquiry and kits were developed to support teachers in the transition from traditional to more inquiry-based instructional practices (Bredderman, 1983; Shymansky, Hedges, & Woodworth, 1990; Shymansky, Kyle, & Alport, 1983). By the 1970s, kits were associated with ‘activity-based’ programs. These early programs received substantial support by governmental agencies such as the National Science Foundation in USA and were developed by panels of ‘scientists, developmental psychologists, teachers, and evaluators’ to promote inquiry in science instruction (Bredderman, 1983, p. 500). Bredderman reviewed three of these programs and found that they shared a focus on ‘experience, experimentation, and observation’ (p. 500). Science content was still an important component of the new curricula, which added a focus on basic inquiry skills. These newer programs did not include student textbooks and instead promoted the purchase of the ‘commercially prepared laboratory material kits’ (Bredderman, 1983, p. 500). Kits have been developed for classrooms, distance education, and home use in a number of countries such as Canada (Connors, 2004) and Australia.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - The use of kits in elementary science classes is a growing trend in some countries. Kits provide materials and inquiry lessons in a ready-to-teach format for teachers to use in their science instruction. This study examined elementary teachers' instructional strategies, classroom practices, and assessment types in relation to the frequency of science kit use. A total of 503 elementary teachers from an urban school district received professional development, implemented kits in their classrooms for a year, and then completed a survey about science kit use and teaching practices. Despite similarities in demographic characteristics (gender, ethnicity, certification/educational level), there were significant differences in teachers' use of inquirybased teaching and assessment practices by kit use. Teachers who reported using kits the most often were significantly more likely to report that their students designed and implemented laboratory investigations as well recorded, represented, and analyzed data. In addition, the high kit users indicated that they were more likely to use student groups, require students to use evidence to support claims, and use alternative assessments of student work including portfolios, notebooks, and long-term projects than those teachers who used kits less frequently. Those teachers who reported using kits the least often were significantly more likely to report having students practice for standardized tests. The role of kits in promoting reform-based teaching practices is discussed.
AB - The use of kits in elementary science classes is a growing trend in some countries. Kits provide materials and inquiry lessons in a ready-to-teach format for teachers to use in their science instruction. This study examined elementary teachers' instructional strategies, classroom practices, and assessment types in relation to the frequency of science kit use. A total of 503 elementary teachers from an urban school district received professional development, implemented kits in their classrooms for a year, and then completed a survey about science kit use and teaching practices. Despite similarities in demographic characteristics (gender, ethnicity, certification/educational level), there were significant differences in teachers' use of inquirybased teaching and assessment practices by kit use. Teachers who reported using kits the most often were significantly more likely to report that their students designed and implemented laboratory investigations as well recorded, represented, and analyzed data. In addition, the high kit users indicated that they were more likely to use student groups, require students to use evidence to support claims, and use alternative assessments of student work including portfolios, notebooks, and long-term projects than those teachers who used kits less frequently. Those teachers who reported using kits the least often were significantly more likely to report having students practice for standardized tests. The role of kits in promoting reform-based teaching practices is discussed.
KW - Curriculum
KW - Teacher actions
KW - Teacher development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870262450&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870262450&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09500693.2011.602755
DO - 10.1080/09500693.2011.602755
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84870262450
SN - 0950-0693
VL - 34
SP - 2371
EP - 2391
JO - International Journal of Science Education
JF - International Journal of Science Education
IS - 15
ER -