Different Processes, Different Outcomes? Assessing the Individual-Level Impacts of Public Participation

Suyeon Jo, Tina Nabatchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article empirically investigates the relative efficacy of different direct participation processes. Specifically, it compares the effects of three types of participatory processes (public meetings, focus groups, and citizen juries) on participants' issue awareness, competence, empowerment, and trust in service professionals. The authors hypothesize that all three participatory processes will positively affect these individual outcomes but that the magnitudes of effects will differ across the three processes. Using data from field experiments, the authors test and find general support for the hypotheses. This study contributes to understanding of public participation, particularly in terms of the relationship between participatory design and outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPublic Administration Review
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Different Processes, Different Outcomes? Assessing the Individual-Level Impacts of Public Participation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this