TY - JOUR
T1 - Differences in plasticity between hard and soft spheres
AU - Morse, Peter
AU - Wijtmans, Sven
AU - Van Deen, Merlijn
AU - Van Hecke, Martin
AU - Manning, M. Lisa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Physical Society.
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - Contact changes in packings of sheared hard spheres invariably trigger instabilities and irreversible rearrangements, providing an archetypal scenario for plasticity of disordered media. Here we show that the plasticity of jammed soft spheres at any finite pressure follows a different scenario, with only 14% of contact changes leading to irreversible rearrangements, irrespective of pressure, size, dimension or interaction potential. Moreover, we find that for sheared soft spheres, the nonlinear quantities associated with either contact changes or irreversible events exhibit the same finite-size scaling with pressure and system size as linear response quantities such as the shear modulus, suggesting an unexpected connection between curvature and saddle points in the potential energy landscape. Together our results indicate that soft spheres at finite pressure are not a smooth perturbation away from hard spheres, and that the nonlinear response of soft spheres is singular at zero pressure.
AB - Contact changes in packings of sheared hard spheres invariably trigger instabilities and irreversible rearrangements, providing an archetypal scenario for plasticity of disordered media. Here we show that the plasticity of jammed soft spheres at any finite pressure follows a different scenario, with only 14% of contact changes leading to irreversible rearrangements, irrespective of pressure, size, dimension or interaction potential. Moreover, we find that for sheared soft spheres, the nonlinear quantities associated with either contact changes or irreversible events exhibit the same finite-size scaling with pressure and system size as linear response quantities such as the shear modulus, suggesting an unexpected connection between curvature and saddle points in the potential energy landscape. Together our results indicate that soft spheres at finite pressure are not a smooth perturbation away from hard spheres, and that the nonlinear response of soft spheres is singular at zero pressure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115898624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85115898624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023179
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023179
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85115898624
SN - 2643-1564
VL - 2
JO - Physical Review Research
JF - Physical Review Research
IS - 2
M1 - 023179
ER -