Development and Validation of the Policies, Opportunities, Initiatives and Notable Topics (POINTS) Audit for Campuses and Worksites

Tanya M Horacek, Marlei Simon, Elif Dede Yildirim, Adrienne A. White, Karla P. Shelnutt, Kristin Riggsbee, Melissa D. Olfert, Jesse Stabile Morrell, Anne E. Mathews, Wenjun Zhou, Tandalayo Kidd, Kendra Kattelmann, Geoffrey Greene, Lisa Franzen-Castle, Sarah Colby, Carol Byrd-Bredbenner, Onikia Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Workplace or campus wellness/obesity-prevention policies and initiatives can improve health. Research tools to assess worksite or campus policies/initiatives are scarce. Thus, the aim of this research is to develop and validate the policies, opportunities, initiatives, and notable topics (POINTS) audit. Methods: POINTS was developed and refined via expert review, pilot-testing, and field testing. Trained researchers completed a web-based review from a student-focus or employee-focus regarding 34 health-promoting topics for colleges. Each topic was evaluated on a 0⁻2 scale: 0 = no policy/initiative, 1 = initiatives, 2 = written policy. When a written policy was detected, additional policy support questions (administered, monitored, reviewed) were completed. Results: Cronbach's Alpha for the student-focused POINTS audit was α = 0.787 (34 items, possible points = 65), and for the employee-focused POINTS audit was α = 0.807 (26 items, possible points = 50). A total of 115 student-focused and 33 employee-focused audits were completed. Although there was little evidence of policy presence beyond stimulant standards (smoking and alcohol), there were extensive examples of health initiatives. The student-focused POINTS audit was validated using the Healthier Campus Initiative's survey. Conclusions: POINTS is a web-based audit tool that is valid and useful for pre-assessment, advocacy, benchmarking, and tracking policies for health and well-being for students (campus) and employees (worksite).

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational journal of environmental research and public health
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 4 2019

Fingerprint

Policy Making
Workplace
Students
Health
Benchmarking
Health Policy
Research
Obesity
Smoking

Keywords

  • college
  • environmental audit
  • health promotion policy
  • web-based assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Development and Validation of the Policies, Opportunities, Initiatives and Notable Topics (POINTS) Audit for Campuses and Worksites. / Horacek, Tanya M; Simon, Marlei; Dede Yildirim, Elif; White, Adrienne A.; Shelnutt, Karla P.; Riggsbee, Kristin; Olfert, Melissa D.; Morrell, Jesse Stabile; Mathews, Anne E.; Zhou, Wenjun; Kidd, Tandalayo; Kattelmann, Kendra; Greene, Geoffrey; Franzen-Castle, Lisa; Colby, Sarah; Byrd-Bredbenner, Carol; Brown, Onikia.

In: International journal of environmental research and public health, Vol. 16, No. 5, 04.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Horacek, TM, Simon, M, Dede Yildirim, E, White, AA, Shelnutt, KP, Riggsbee, K, Olfert, MD, Morrell, JS, Mathews, AE, Zhou, W, Kidd, T, Kattelmann, K, Greene, G, Franzen-Castle, L, Colby, S, Byrd-Bredbenner, C & Brown, O 2019, 'Development and Validation of the Policies, Opportunities, Initiatives and Notable Topics (POINTS) Audit for Campuses and Worksites', International journal of environmental research and public health, vol. 16, no. 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050778
Horacek, Tanya M ; Simon, Marlei ; Dede Yildirim, Elif ; White, Adrienne A. ; Shelnutt, Karla P. ; Riggsbee, Kristin ; Olfert, Melissa D. ; Morrell, Jesse Stabile ; Mathews, Anne E. ; Zhou, Wenjun ; Kidd, Tandalayo ; Kattelmann, Kendra ; Greene, Geoffrey ; Franzen-Castle, Lisa ; Colby, Sarah ; Byrd-Bredbenner, Carol ; Brown, Onikia. / Development and Validation of the Policies, Opportunities, Initiatives and Notable Topics (POINTS) Audit for Campuses and Worksites. In: International journal of environmental research and public health. 2019 ; Vol. 16, No. 5.
@article{4d1a3cd4c38e4eebb3b3d2a333744230,
title = "Development and Validation of the Policies, Opportunities, Initiatives and Notable Topics (POINTS) Audit for Campuses and Worksites",
abstract = "Background: Workplace or campus wellness/obesity-prevention policies and initiatives can improve health. Research tools to assess worksite or campus policies/initiatives are scarce. Thus, the aim of this research is to develop and validate the policies, opportunities, initiatives, and notable topics (POINTS) audit. Methods: POINTS was developed and refined via expert review, pilot-testing, and field testing. Trained researchers completed a web-based review from a student-focus or employee-focus regarding 34 health-promoting topics for colleges. Each topic was evaluated on a 0⁻2 scale: 0 = no policy/initiative, 1 = initiatives, 2 = written policy. When a written policy was detected, additional policy support questions (administered, monitored, reviewed) were completed. Results: Cronbach's Alpha for the student-focused POINTS audit was α = 0.787 (34 items, possible points = 65), and for the employee-focused POINTS audit was α = 0.807 (26 items, possible points = 50). A total of 115 student-focused and 33 employee-focused audits were completed. Although there was little evidence of policy presence beyond stimulant standards (smoking and alcohol), there were extensive examples of health initiatives. The student-focused POINTS audit was validated using the Healthier Campus Initiative's survey. Conclusions: POINTS is a web-based audit tool that is valid and useful for pre-assessment, advocacy, benchmarking, and tracking policies for health and well-being for students (campus) and employees (worksite).",
keywords = "college, environmental audit, health promotion policy, web-based assessment",
author = "Horacek, {Tanya M} and Marlei Simon and {Dede Yildirim}, Elif and White, {Adrienne A.} and Shelnutt, {Karla P.} and Kristin Riggsbee and Olfert, {Melissa D.} and Morrell, {Jesse Stabile} and Mathews, {Anne E.} and Wenjun Zhou and Tandalayo Kidd and Kendra Kattelmann and Geoffrey Greene and Lisa Franzen-Castle and Sarah Colby and Carol Byrd-Bredbenner and Onikia Brown",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph16050778",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
issn = "1661-7827",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and Validation of the Policies, Opportunities, Initiatives and Notable Topics (POINTS) Audit for Campuses and Worksites

AU - Horacek, Tanya M

AU - Simon, Marlei

AU - Dede Yildirim, Elif

AU - White, Adrienne A.

AU - Shelnutt, Karla P.

AU - Riggsbee, Kristin

AU - Olfert, Melissa D.

AU - Morrell, Jesse Stabile

AU - Mathews, Anne E.

AU - Zhou, Wenjun

AU - Kidd, Tandalayo

AU - Kattelmann, Kendra

AU - Greene, Geoffrey

AU - Franzen-Castle, Lisa

AU - Colby, Sarah

AU - Byrd-Bredbenner, Carol

AU - Brown, Onikia

PY - 2019/3/4

Y1 - 2019/3/4

N2 - Background: Workplace or campus wellness/obesity-prevention policies and initiatives can improve health. Research tools to assess worksite or campus policies/initiatives are scarce. Thus, the aim of this research is to develop and validate the policies, opportunities, initiatives, and notable topics (POINTS) audit. Methods: POINTS was developed and refined via expert review, pilot-testing, and field testing. Trained researchers completed a web-based review from a student-focus or employee-focus regarding 34 health-promoting topics for colleges. Each topic was evaluated on a 0⁻2 scale: 0 = no policy/initiative, 1 = initiatives, 2 = written policy. When a written policy was detected, additional policy support questions (administered, monitored, reviewed) were completed. Results: Cronbach's Alpha for the student-focused POINTS audit was α = 0.787 (34 items, possible points = 65), and for the employee-focused POINTS audit was α = 0.807 (26 items, possible points = 50). A total of 115 student-focused and 33 employee-focused audits were completed. Although there was little evidence of policy presence beyond stimulant standards (smoking and alcohol), there were extensive examples of health initiatives. The student-focused POINTS audit was validated using the Healthier Campus Initiative's survey. Conclusions: POINTS is a web-based audit tool that is valid and useful for pre-assessment, advocacy, benchmarking, and tracking policies for health and well-being for students (campus) and employees (worksite).

AB - Background: Workplace or campus wellness/obesity-prevention policies and initiatives can improve health. Research tools to assess worksite or campus policies/initiatives are scarce. Thus, the aim of this research is to develop and validate the policies, opportunities, initiatives, and notable topics (POINTS) audit. Methods: POINTS was developed and refined via expert review, pilot-testing, and field testing. Trained researchers completed a web-based review from a student-focus or employee-focus regarding 34 health-promoting topics for colleges. Each topic was evaluated on a 0⁻2 scale: 0 = no policy/initiative, 1 = initiatives, 2 = written policy. When a written policy was detected, additional policy support questions (administered, monitored, reviewed) were completed. Results: Cronbach's Alpha for the student-focused POINTS audit was α = 0.787 (34 items, possible points = 65), and for the employee-focused POINTS audit was α = 0.807 (26 items, possible points = 50). A total of 115 student-focused and 33 employee-focused audits were completed. Although there was little evidence of policy presence beyond stimulant standards (smoking and alcohol), there were extensive examples of health initiatives. The student-focused POINTS audit was validated using the Healthier Campus Initiative's survey. Conclusions: POINTS is a web-based audit tool that is valid and useful for pre-assessment, advocacy, benchmarking, and tracking policies for health and well-being for students (campus) and employees (worksite).

KW - college

KW - environmental audit

KW - health promotion policy

KW - web-based assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062622524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062622524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph16050778

DO - 10.3390/ijerph16050778

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1661-7827

IS - 5

ER -