Deep Listening: Practicing Intellectual Humility in Geographic Fieldwork

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The political and ethical quandaries of the “crisis of representation” that beset the social sciences from the 1980s on continue to reverberate in how geographers conduct their research today. Illustrated with two vignettes from my research in the UAE and Kazakhstan, this article explores the idea of “deep listening” as a methodological tack and mindset to guide geographic fieldwork, rooted in intellectual humility. Deep listening involves a critical reflexivity about our subject positions as researchers, as well as a suspicion of metanarratives that prevail in the media and academic debates, and a willingness to question our complicity in reproducing those narratives through our choice of research topics and methods. Deep listening is ultimately a way of practicing intellectual humility – which involves accepting that we could be incorrect at many levels, whether theoretical, factual, emotional, social, cultural, or political, and seeking out opportunities to change our mind.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalGeographical Review
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

fieldwork
Kazakhstan
reflexivity
research method
social science
narrative
method

Keywords

  • listening
  • qualitative methods
  • representation
  • research ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

Deep Listening : Practicing Intellectual Humility in Geographic Fieldwork. / Koch, Natalie.

In: Geographical Review, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{618e65609c2343208ef5ad95195fdfd8,
title = "Deep Listening: Practicing Intellectual Humility in Geographic Fieldwork",
abstract = "The political and ethical quandaries of the “crisis of representation” that beset the social sciences from the 1980s on continue to reverberate in how geographers conduct their research today. Illustrated with two vignettes from my research in the UAE and Kazakhstan, this article explores the idea of “deep listening” as a methodological tack and mindset to guide geographic fieldwork, rooted in intellectual humility. Deep listening involves a critical reflexivity about our subject positions as researchers, as well as a suspicion of metanarratives that prevail in the media and academic debates, and a willingness to question our complicity in reproducing those narratives through our choice of research topics and methods. Deep listening is ultimately a way of practicing intellectual humility – which involves accepting that we could be incorrect at many levels, whether theoretical, factual, emotional, social, cultural, or political, and seeking out opportunities to change our mind.",
keywords = "listening, qualitative methods, representation, research ethics",
author = "Natalie Koch",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/gere.12334",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Geographical Review",
issn = "0016-7428",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deep Listening

T2 - Practicing Intellectual Humility in Geographic Fieldwork

AU - Koch, Natalie

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The political and ethical quandaries of the “crisis of representation” that beset the social sciences from the 1980s on continue to reverberate in how geographers conduct their research today. Illustrated with two vignettes from my research in the UAE and Kazakhstan, this article explores the idea of “deep listening” as a methodological tack and mindset to guide geographic fieldwork, rooted in intellectual humility. Deep listening involves a critical reflexivity about our subject positions as researchers, as well as a suspicion of metanarratives that prevail in the media and academic debates, and a willingness to question our complicity in reproducing those narratives through our choice of research topics and methods. Deep listening is ultimately a way of practicing intellectual humility – which involves accepting that we could be incorrect at many levels, whether theoretical, factual, emotional, social, cultural, or political, and seeking out opportunities to change our mind.

AB - The political and ethical quandaries of the “crisis of representation” that beset the social sciences from the 1980s on continue to reverberate in how geographers conduct their research today. Illustrated with two vignettes from my research in the UAE and Kazakhstan, this article explores the idea of “deep listening” as a methodological tack and mindset to guide geographic fieldwork, rooted in intellectual humility. Deep listening involves a critical reflexivity about our subject positions as researchers, as well as a suspicion of metanarratives that prevail in the media and academic debates, and a willingness to question our complicity in reproducing those narratives through our choice of research topics and methods. Deep listening is ultimately a way of practicing intellectual humility – which involves accepting that we could be incorrect at many levels, whether theoretical, factual, emotional, social, cultural, or political, and seeking out opportunities to change our mind.

KW - listening

KW - qualitative methods

KW - representation

KW - research ethics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062558964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062558964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gere.12334

DO - 10.1111/gere.12334

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062558964

JO - Geographical Review

JF - Geographical Review

SN - 0016-7428

ER -