TY - JOUR
T1 - Deconvolution of Impulse Response from Time-Limited Input and Output
T2 - Theory and Experiment
AU - Sarkar, Tapan K.
AU - Tseng, Fung I.
AU - Rao, Sadisiva M.
AU - Dianat, Soheil A.
AU - Hollmann, Bruce Z.
PY - 1985/12
Y1 - 1985/12
N2 - Since it is impossible to generate and propagate an impulse, often a system is excited by a narrow time-domain pulse. The output is recorded and then a numerical deconvolution is often done to extract the impulse response of the object. Classically, the fast Fourier transform (FFT) technique has been applied with much success to the above deconvolution problem. However, when the signal-to-noise ratio. becomes small, sometimes one encounters instability with the FFT approach, In this paper, the method of conjugate gradient is applied to the deconvolution problem. The problem is solved entirely in the time domain. The method converges for any initial guess in a finite number of steps. Also, for the application of the conjugate gradient method, the time samples need not be uniform, like FFT. Since, in this case, one is solving the operator equation directly, by passing the autocorrelation matrix computation, storage required is 5N as opposed to N2 Computed impulse response utilizing this technique has been presented for measured incident and scattered fields.
AB - Since it is impossible to generate and propagate an impulse, often a system is excited by a narrow time-domain pulse. The output is recorded and then a numerical deconvolution is often done to extract the impulse response of the object. Classically, the fast Fourier transform (FFT) technique has been applied with much success to the above deconvolution problem. However, when the signal-to-noise ratio. becomes small, sometimes one encounters instability with the FFT approach, In this paper, the method of conjugate gradient is applied to the deconvolution problem. The problem is solved entirely in the time domain. The method converges for any initial guess in a finite number of steps. Also, for the application of the conjugate gradient method, the time samples need not be uniform, like FFT. Since, in this case, one is solving the operator equation directly, by passing the autocorrelation matrix computation, storage required is 5N as opposed to N2 Computed impulse response utilizing this technique has been presented for measured incident and scattered fields.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022287384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022287384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TIM.1985.4315400
DO - 10.1109/TIM.1985.4315400
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0022287384
SN - 0018-9456
VL - 34
SP - 541
EP - 546
JO - IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
JF - IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
IS - 4
ER -